Avatar feed
Responses: 2
SFC George Smith
1
1
0
Edited >1 y ago
Interesting I thought This type material was replaced 25 years ago... I thought they changed out at Kadena AB in Okinawa in 1991 and other Bases shortly there after......
I Stand Corrected...
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Stephen F.
0
0
0
Edited >1 y ago
Since the foam in question is only used for "where potentially catastrophic fuel fires can occur, such as in a plane crash, because it can rapidly extinguish the flames" which I expect is a rare and know is a very dangerous thing, this reminds me about DDT which is so effective at killing mosquitos cheaply that an effort was launched to ban it for decades SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL. Much more expensive bug sprays were developed but they were not as effective or efficient as DDT.
When I was young growing up outside Philadelphia we used to run behind the DDT trucks and play in the cloud of smoke because there were no bugs there and the bugs would leave us alone after we were in the cloud.
It is not surprising that the over-regulatory U.S. Environmental Protection Agency would be more concerned about potential ground water contamination for a life saving foam because it "contains perfluorooctane sulfonate and perfluorooctanoic acid, or PFOS and PFOA, which are both considered emerging contaminants by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and have been linked to cancer and other illnesses."
SSgt (Join to see) SrA Christopher Wright
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close