Amy Coney Barrett can't name five freedoms in the First Amendment

So you are against lifetime appointments for justices then? Since age plays a factor in cognitive ability or the ability to stay awake i guess. I think defending any justice for incompetence should be met with derision.

And we have a future justice who will get a lifetime appointment that couldn't answer a simple question which appears on the U.S Citizenship test. Although on the citizenship test you only have to get 1 of 5. But as a future SCJ, I expect her to ace that question.

1SG (Join to see) - Blow it up as big as you can. It only makes you look all the more foolish. Just consider the fact that Judge Barrett repeatedly fielded the inane "questions" from Dem senators reading hesitantly from copious notes provided by their staffs, while Judge Barrett replied to their "inaccuracies" from memory, and when asked about it, displayed a blank note pad. That makes your attack on Judge Barrett quite pale when seen in the big picture.
None of the Dem senators, a clever bunch – to give those devils their due, was foolish enough to attack Judge Barrett for her oversight, but you think you've got her by the hair.

No excuses needed for Judge Barrett's replies. The laughable weakness of your attempt to belittle her proves that.

CW3 Harvey K. - No it does not. Your defense of her is laughable. The question was fielded to her by a REPUBLICAN senator. It was a softball question assuming she would nail the question and he could then move on. The REPUBLICANS continued to press her on her religion. She ducked and dodged questions that she shouldn't have and that spoke volumes to myself and others. Continue to look foolish if you must.

1SG (Join to see) - Okay. Have it your way – you are smarter than that bunch of Dem senators on that panel who missed an opportunity to eliminate Judge Barrett from any further consideration for the Supreme Court. It is an opportunity you -- in your brilliance, have seized upon. Why, you've got Judge Barrett dead to rights as PROVEN to be incompetent in Constitutional Law, and therefore unfit for the office of Justice of the Supreme Court.
The “ducked and dodged” questions were rejected by Judge Barrett in full accord with the principle stated by the revered Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, as the Dems had to be pointedly (and frequently) reminded.
Go right ahead and continue in your delusion. It would be foolish of me to stop you.

Yep this republican senator threw her a softball and it turned into a gotcha. Amazing how the republicans senators spent more time on her religion and getting her to profess her faith than the democrats did.

1SG (Join to see) - Because the last Justice was attacked based on his religion and not once but repeatedly. So I do not blame any Republican for attempting to immunize the candidate against planned attacks. Religion for some reason is an issue for Democrats be it Catholic, Jewish or Islam......it keeps slipping out again and again.

SPC Erich Guenther - You are free to believe what ever right wing conspiracy theory you wish. There will be 6 catholic justices after confirmation. 1 of which was appointed by Obama. The other (Kagan) is a follower of Judaism.