Posted on Apr 11, 2019
AOC: Climate Change Causing Migrant Crisis – Conservative Alerts
1.38K
128
32
26
26
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 21
MAJ Bryan Zeski
SP5 Mark Kuzinski "Hey look! I can put up a meme about someone being dumb, but provide zero evidence that refutes their position!"
(1)
(0)
SSG Robert Webster
MAJ Bryan Zeski - Then you have not read their House Resolution - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/62/116th_United_States_Congress_H._Res.0109_%281st_session%29_-_Recognizing_the_duty_of_the_Federal_Government_to_create_a_Green_New_Deal.pdf
There is plenty of false and provably incorrect or wrong information in it. And there are more or less about 68 Representatives that signed on to this garbage. This includes the vaunted Mr. Jerry Nadler, Mr. Adam Schiff, Ms. Maxine Waters, Ms. Rashida Tlaib, and Mr. Ted Lieu.
The report that this proposed legislation is based on came from the UN through its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
"The IPCC is a political organization, not a scientific body. It was formed by the United Nations in 1988 for the purpose of establishing the need for a global solution to the alleged problem of anthropogenic climate change. Note that the mission of the IPCC was never to study the causes of climate change; were that the case, it might have devoted some of its billions of dollars in revenues over the years to examining solar cycles, changes in ocean currents, the sensitivity of climate to greenhouse gases, or the planet's carbon cycle. The IPCC has spent trivial sums on these issues, and the authors of and contributors to its voluminous reports have few or no credentials in these fields."
https://www.heartland.org/news-opinion/news/the-ipcc-is-still-wrong-on-climate-change-scientists-prove-it
http://climatechangereconsidered.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/10-05-18-DRAFT-CCRII-Fossil-Fuels-Summary-for-Policy-Makers.pdf
So, YES they are dumb and vacuous (empty-headed, absentminded). So yes, there is plenty to refute their beliefs and what I have provided is just the beginning. Which leads to the rest of the proposed legislation to be just as questionable and refutable.
There is plenty of false and provably incorrect or wrong information in it. And there are more or less about 68 Representatives that signed on to this garbage. This includes the vaunted Mr. Jerry Nadler, Mr. Adam Schiff, Ms. Maxine Waters, Ms. Rashida Tlaib, and Mr. Ted Lieu.
The report that this proposed legislation is based on came from the UN through its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
"The IPCC is a political organization, not a scientific body. It was formed by the United Nations in 1988 for the purpose of establishing the need for a global solution to the alleged problem of anthropogenic climate change. Note that the mission of the IPCC was never to study the causes of climate change; were that the case, it might have devoted some of its billions of dollars in revenues over the years to examining solar cycles, changes in ocean currents, the sensitivity of climate to greenhouse gases, or the planet's carbon cycle. The IPCC has spent trivial sums on these issues, and the authors of and contributors to its voluminous reports have few or no credentials in these fields."
https://www.heartland.org/news-opinion/news/the-ipcc-is-still-wrong-on-climate-change-scientists-prove-it
http://climatechangereconsidered.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/10-05-18-DRAFT-CCRII-Fossil-Fuels-Summary-for-Policy-Makers.pdf
So, YES they are dumb and vacuous (empty-headed, absentminded). So yes, there is plenty to refute their beliefs and what I have provided is just the beginning. Which leads to the rest of the proposed legislation to be just as questionable and refutable.
File not found: /v1/AUTH_mw/wikipedia-commons-local-public.62/6/62/116th_United_States_Congress_H._Res.0109_%25281st_session%2529_-_Recognizing_the_duty_of_the_Federal_Government_to_create_a_Green_New_Deal.pdf
(1)
(0)
SP5 Mark Kuzinski
SSG Robert Webster - Some people are not worth replying to - but thank you Robert.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next