Avatar feed
Responses: 3
MSG Intermediate Care Technician
2
2
0
So the article says he is being charged with manufacturing armor piercing rounds because his prints were on unspent rounds.....but the article mentions nothing else about those rounds but discusses tracer rounds? Something is off in this article.
(2)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Byron Oyler
MAJ Byron Oyler
7 y
A lot of questions remain and is off. I still believe there was a belt fed 5.56 and belt fed 7.62, not what was found in his room.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth
0
0
0
Lock him up, and lose the key.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Christopher Brose
0
0
0
Edited 7 y ago
It wasn't clear in the article what laws, if any, the guy broke.

P.S. Earthlink is still a thing? I thought it died a long time ago.
(0)
Comment
(0)
SN James MacKay
SN James MacKay
7 y
Not specifically, but it's the armor piercing rounds that is stated as the problem.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CDR Dan Cunningham
CDR Dan Cunningham
7 y
SN James MacKay - It's easy to state he 'manufactured armor piercing rounds', but there's no additional info. ATF tried to ban 5.56 M855 (green tip) ammo a couple of years ago because it was 'armor piercing', but they failed. Civilians own tens of millions of this particular cartridge. News of this type is always presented as though everybody should be triggered by the words 'armor piercing' and mindlessly nod that this must be a 'bad guy'.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Christopher Brose
SSgt Christopher Brose
7 y
SN James MacKay - I realize the article stated armor piercing rounds as a problem, but without identifying a specific law that was being broken, I have no way of knowing if was just a problem for the author because he doesn't like the idea of someone selling armor piercing ammo.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close