Posted on Oct 16, 2023
Army general says moldy barracks are a 'discipline problem'
2.52K
10
5
1
1
0
Posted 1 y ago
Responses: 3
Really? Mold in barracks and housing is a "discipline" problem? That soldiers and their families aren't "adulting?" This general really puts the blame of mold on the soldiers and their families?
And yet the Army keeps wondering why they can't recruit or retain people..."leaders" go off like this and blame issues on the soldiers and their families.
And yet the Army keeps wondering why they can't recruit or retain people..."leaders" go off like this and blame issues on the soldiers and their families.
(3)
(0)
SGT Aaron Atwood
Not just "leaders," but the private landlords in charge of post housing as well. Heck, off base landlords too.
(1)
(0)
Either he was told to say that, or he really doesn't give a flying F for those who live in such intolerable conditions. Either way he's part of the problem; not the solution!
You can properly "adult" all you want. That won't make mold go away. Once it's there that's it. Short of completely demolishing the structure and starting over from complete scratch there is almost nothing you can do to effectively get rid of mold without bringing in professional help.
You can properly "adult" all you want. That won't make mold go away. Once it's there that's it. Short of completely demolishing the structure and starting over from complete scratch there is almost nothing you can do to effectively get rid of mold without bringing in professional help.
(2)
(0)
Somewhat accurate, but very misleading.
First, it is clear from his comments that he was referring to Fort Cavazos (You know he's going to take some grief for referring to it as Fort Hood publically during AUSA...) specifically and not the Army overall. Second, the article completely recharacterizes the theme of his response from being "responsible and engaged leadership" to "Soldiers need to solve the problem themselves".
You can see the entire AUSA panel discussion for "Taking Care of People" at https://www.dvidshub.net/webcast/32827. The question is asked at the 1:19:35 mark and MG Isenhower's response starts at 1:24:48 following LTG Jones' comments.
His comment was that there are two phrases that best answer the question that was asked -
1) "Taking care of Soldier problems" - Leadership's job is to solve those problems and you need to hold lower-level leaders accountable to engage and do everything within their power to get the issue solved.
2) "Adulting" - The comments above are accurate, but completely mischaracterize his comments as "Soldiers need to solve this themselves" and stopped short of his comments about leaders being responsible for solving problems
The article glosses over his first key point by saying, "Isenhower went afterward, agreeing in part with Jones" and focuses on the content without the context of his second point including his finishing remarks.
He didn't "finish his remarks by again saying soldiers can solve the matter themselves". He finished his remarks by again going back to it being a leadership responsibility - It's a 'full stop' when it comes to issues of quality of life, safety and health, and finance. Leaders use those opportunities to coach Soldiers to be responsible adults because in many cases they (the Soldier) have misdiagnosed the problem or can solve the problem themselves.
The entire theme of his four minute response was leader engagement and those leaders assuming responsibility when Soldiers have persistent issues that can't be resolved. In situations where it should be handled by the Soldier, then leaders need to educate and coach soldiers on taking responsibility.
Why the author* wrote it up the way he did I have no idea, but it is very much the opposite of the theme of what MG Isenhower gave as a response.
-----------------------------
* Nicholas Slayton - https://taskandpurpose.com/author/nicholas-slayton/
LTC Eugene Chu PV2 Larry Sellnow SGT Aaron Atwood
First, it is clear from his comments that he was referring to Fort Cavazos (You know he's going to take some grief for referring to it as Fort Hood publically during AUSA...) specifically and not the Army overall. Second, the article completely recharacterizes the theme of his response from being "responsible and engaged leadership" to "Soldiers need to solve the problem themselves".
You can see the entire AUSA panel discussion for "Taking Care of People" at https://www.dvidshub.net/webcast/32827. The question is asked at the 1:19:35 mark and MG Isenhower's response starts at 1:24:48 following LTG Jones' comments.
His comment was that there are two phrases that best answer the question that was asked -
1) "Taking care of Soldier problems" - Leadership's job is to solve those problems and you need to hold lower-level leaders accountable to engage and do everything within their power to get the issue solved.
2) "Adulting" - The comments above are accurate, but completely mischaracterize his comments as "Soldiers need to solve this themselves" and stopped short of his comments about leaders being responsible for solving problems
The article glosses over his first key point by saying, "Isenhower went afterward, agreeing in part with Jones" and focuses on the content without the context of his second point including his finishing remarks.
He didn't "finish his remarks by again saying soldiers can solve the matter themselves". He finished his remarks by again going back to it being a leadership responsibility - It's a 'full stop' when it comes to issues of quality of life, safety and health, and finance. Leaders use those opportunities to coach Soldiers to be responsible adults because in many cases they (the Soldier) have misdiagnosed the problem or can solve the problem themselves.
The entire theme of his four minute response was leader engagement and those leaders assuming responsibility when Soldiers have persistent issues that can't be resolved. In situations where it should be handled by the Soldier, then leaders need to educate and coach soldiers on taking responsibility.
Why the author* wrote it up the way he did I have no idea, but it is very much the opposite of the theme of what MG Isenhower gave as a response.
-----------------------------
* Nicholas Slayton - https://taskandpurpose.com/author/nicholas-slayton/
LTC Eugene Chu PV2 Larry Sellnow SGT Aaron Atwood
(1)
(0)
Read This Next