While doing genealogical research I happened upon a bit of history concerning the Jamestown colony in Virginia. To be honest, I’d never heard of Bacon’s Rebellion before but found it fascinating. I also found it interesting, if a bit shocking, that “brabbling” could be considered disorderly speech. The woman mentioned in a quote was my 11th great aunt, Elizabeth Watson Wilson Regan (1635 – 1727).
Brabbling Women: Disorderly Speech and the Law in Early Virginia by Terri L. Snyder:
Brabbling Women takes its title from a 1662 law enacted by Virginia's burgesses, which was intended to offer relief to the "poore husbands" forced into defamation suits because their "brabbling" wives had slandered or scandalized their neighbors. To quell such episodes of female misrule, lawmakers decreed that husbands could choose either to pay damages or to have their wives publicly ducked.
But there was more at stake here. By examining women's use of language, Terri L. Snyder demonstrates how women resisted and challenged oppressive political, legal, and cultural practices in colonial Virginia. Contending that women's voices are heard most clearly during episodes of crisis, Snyder focuses on disorderly speech to illustrate women's complex relationships to law and authority in the seventeenth century. Ordinary women, Snyder finds, employed a variety of strategies to prevail in domestic crises over sexual coercion and adultery, conflicts over women's status as servants or slaves, and threats to women's authority as independent household governors. Some women entered the political forum, openly participating as rebels or loyalists; others sought legal redress for their complaints. Wives protested the confines of marriage; unfree women spoke against masters and servitude. By the force of their words, all strove to thwart political leaders and local officials, as well as the power of husbands, masters, and neighbors. The tactics colonial women used, and the successes they met, reflect the struggles for empowerment taking place in defiance of the inequalities of the colonial period.
From Cornell University Press:
We then have multiple refs to Bacon's Rebellion and any disruptive behavior in this time period is lumped under the headline of that conflict. Thus, though Daniel Regan's name never appears on any Bacon's Rebellion list, his actions, and his wife's, do speak to the tenor of the times and he is often in hot water with the authorities.
Order Book, 1671 to 1691. , Surry County, VA, in custody of Surry Court House, Surry, VA. page 133. 17 Feb., 167 6/7. Complaint being made to this Court that one Elizabeth Regan, the wife of Daniell Regan hath several times and in several places fomented many malignant and rebellious words tending to sedition, do hereby order that Samuell Judkins, Constable or his Headborough do forthwith carry the said Regan to the Common Whipping Place, and give her ten lashes on her bare back, well laid on her bare back (0.B. 1671-90, p. 133).