Posted on Apr 25, 2018
Body Armor for Civilian Self-Defense: Is It For You? - USA Carry
1.67K
39
13
8
8
0
Kinda makes sense, Chicago has taken away the ability of law abiding citizens to defend themselves actively, may as well take away the ability to protect themselves passively as well.
Body Armor for Civilian Self-Defense: Is It For You? - USA Carry
Posted from usacarry.comPosted in these groups: 
Firearms and Guns
Chicago
Firearms and Guns Chicago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 6
6
6
0
Not "allowed" in the People's Republic of New Jersey. One member of my gun club contributed a vest (or the price of one) to his local police department. When he found out he could not buy the same vest for himself, he stopped payment on the check.
Oops! Just checked. Current NJ law allows "civilians" with clean record to have such armor. Who knows how long that will last with our new governor.
Oops! Just checked. Current NJ law allows "civilians" with clean record to have such armor. Who knows how long that will last with our new governor.
(6)
(0)
6
6
0
4
4
0
Many states have restrictions on body armor possession and use. In California, convicted felons cannot possess body armor.
(4)
(0)
PO3 Steven Sherrill
SMSgt Thor Merich unless they have had their rights fully restored felons cannot possess firearms either. I don't care about restricting access to these items (for all the good the laws do) for convicted criminals, it is restricting law abiding citizens from accessing them that is irritating.
(2)
(0)
SMSgt Thor Merich
Absolutely, it seems that law abiding citizens are losing more of their rights every day.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google