Posted on Jul 26, 2023
Bowe Bergdahl's Sentence Is Thrown Out by Judge as Case Takes New Turn
653
10
4
2
2
0
Bergdahl's attorneys then filed a suit in civilian federal court arguing he was denied a fair trial as a result of Nance's failure to disclose his future employment aspirations, as well as the alleged unlawful command influence.
In his decision, Walton said Nance's actions mirrored the actions of Col. Vance Spath, a military judge at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, whose decisions across four years -- including the case of one of the organizers of the bombing of the USS Cole in 2000 -- were nullified because he failed to disclose his application for a civilian immigration judge position.
In his decision, Walton said Nance's actions mirrored the actions of Col. Vance Spath, a military judge at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, whose decisions across four years -- including the case of one of the organizers of the bombing of the USS Cole in 2000 -- were nullified because he failed to disclose his application for a civilian immigration judge position.
Bowe Bergdahl's Sentence Is Thrown Out by Judge as Case Takes New Turn
Posted from military.com
UCMJ
Justice
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 2
4
4
0
SSG Ben W. interesting "were nullified because he failed to disclose his application for a civilian immigration judge position." Never would have imaged that!
(4)
(0)
0
0
0
Bovine excrement.
On a completely different note, I never paid particular attention, but I just noticed this waste of human existence has not only one GCM, but two! He deserted less than two years into his career. How the HECK did he get those? Who is the Commander who signed off? His/her posterior should be canned, too.
On a completely different note, I never paid particular attention, but I just noticed this waste of human existence has not only one GCM, but two! He deserted less than two years into his career. How the HECK did he get those? Who is the Commander who signed off? His/her posterior should be canned, too.
(0)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
Its the process and since its a judicial process (court) specific rules apply just like any court case. If you have judges or prosecuting attys not following the rules its there F.U. You have to dot your (i's) and dot your T's if you wish to make your conviction stick and pass judicial oversight.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google