Posted on Dec 12, 2017
Byron York: Former top spy rethinks: Maybe we shouldn't have attacked a new president
1.81K
35
13
6
6
0
This gave me a better understanding of what Trump was exposed to, and why he was "paranoid" the intel community was out to get him. They had lost their objectivity and they were no longer apolitical. That's how you lose a president's trust and confidence.
Byron York: Former top spy rethinks: Maybe we shouldn't have attacked a new president
Posted from washingtonexaminer.com
FBI
Donald Trump
Hillary Clinton
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 7
10
10
0
I agree and want to see the FISA warrant that allowed Clinton Inc. to spy on Trump as a candidate.
(10)
(0)
LTC Orlando Illi
Trump lawyer wants separate special prosecutor to probe DOJ-Fusion conflicts
A top member of President Trump’s outside legal team called Tuesday for the appointment of a separate special prosecutor to look into potential conflicts of interest involving Justice Department and FBI officials.
(2)
(0)
LCDR (Join to see)
LTC Orlando Illi - I think that is an empty request, I just wish someone would FOIA the FISA warrant and see if the Dossier was used as evidence to obtain the warrant then look and see who at DOJ and the FBI where involved if Bruce G. Ohr, his wife, the DNC, Clinton Inc, or anyone on Muller's team then DOJ should immediately form a Grand Jury to determine what laws were broken.
(1)
(0)
(1)
(0)
7
7
0
I think there is an issue with anyone that supported Mrs. Clinton. Just by tracking her dealings with the Chinese and Loral Space Systems one should have concluded that the Clinton's are only out to fund their bank account. All of the individuals listed in the article were not out to get Trump. They were and are still out to hide their treasonous acts against America.
(7)
(0)
2
2
0
They twisted the hell out of Morell's words there. No intelligence operative currently working has done anything to Target or be disloyal to the President as far as we know. Retired men can say whatever they want. And looking back on their decisions doesn't mean their statements weren't accurate.
(2)
(0)
Col Joseph Lenertz
I don't think the article tried to claim that it has knowledge that a currently working intelligence agent was disloyal. Where did you see that? Is FBI agent Peter Strzok currently working? Would you say he remained dispassionately objective and apolitical? Why was he removed?
(0)
(0)
LCDR (Join to see)
I'd say he was removed exactly because he wasn't dispassionate, and it's proof that they still value their integrity. You can't point to the removal of man with bias as proof that the agency which removed him from the investigation is biased. Do you realize how absurd that logic is?
(1)
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
Col Joseph Lenertz - So the proved the were biased by firing a biased agent? Please explain how that is is any way logical? Seriously please explain.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google