Posted on Dec 27, 2017
Cities sue Defense Dept. over gun-check system failures
2.09K
15
17
6
6
0
Seriously? What about all the thugs who have never served?
Cities sue Defense Dept. over gun-check system failures
Posted from apnews.com
New York City
Chicago
San Francisco
Gun Control
Pentagon
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 5
2
2
0
Unfortunately for the victims of that particular violence, no one will ever be held accountable for the system failure to enter convicted perps into a database. Can't imagine anyone suing the gvt over this and being successful. How do you punish a system? The only relief is the hope the system will correct itself in the future to prevent this from happening ever again.
(2)
(0)
1
1
0
Since the shooter is dead, we blame the military I guess. Pretty sad when a community has to endure the loss of that many of it's citizens. It's worse that they are grasping at straws and feel that they need to sue the military for their lack of attention in processing a dirt bag's paperwork.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
It's not surprising. The left does leftist things. They don't like firearms in the hands of people they want control over and they will take every advantage, piece by piece, until they reach their goals.
凌迟 - língchí
凌遲 - ling-ch'ih
Death by a Thousand Cuts
凌迟 - língchí
凌遲 - ling-ch'ih
Death by a Thousand Cuts
(1)
(0)
Cpl (Join to see)
I take it you haven't read "H.R. 4268: Gun Safety: Not Sorry Act of 2017" introduced by sheila jackson lee the day after the Sutherland Springs shooting.
Also note, that another bill introduced by Scott Taylor (R-VA) H.R. 4365: Domestic Violence Loophole Closure Act addresses the DoD failure, which has only one cosponser, Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI).
My premise for partisanship is based on congressional member participation and timing.
Also note, that another bill introduced by Scott Taylor (R-VA) H.R. 4365: Domestic Violence Loophole Closure Act addresses the DoD failure, which has only one cosponser, Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI).
My premise for partisanship is based on congressional member participation and timing.
(0)
(0)
SSG Robert Webster
SFC J Fullerton - And what about when the mistake goes in the other direction depriving someone of something that may be rightfully theirs?
One other thing - Congressmen/women don't always follow through with a request for assistance. One of the first things that they do if it comes from a service member is ask if you have gone through the appropriate military channels before making your issue known to them and their staff. Which do you think a congressman is going to respond to more - a letter from a mother/grandmother or a military service member? Usually the mother/grandmother. Why? Because they are the ones most likely to vote and have their vote counted. Service Member with a mail-in ballot, not so much since a significant enough number do not arrive in time to be properly counted.
One other thing - Congressmen/women don't always follow through with a request for assistance. One of the first things that they do if it comes from a service member is ask if you have gone through the appropriate military channels before making your issue known to them and their staff. Which do you think a congressman is going to respond to more - a letter from a mother/grandmother or a military service member? Usually the mother/grandmother. Why? Because they are the ones most likely to vote and have their vote counted. Service Member with a mail-in ballot, not so much since a significant enough number do not arrive in time to be properly counted.
(0)
(0)
SFC J Fullerton
SSG Robert Webster - Your response is incomprehensible and irrelevant to the topic, so I have nothing else to add. Have a blessed day.
(0)
(0)
SFC J Fullerton
Cpl (Join to see) - I am not understanding your points or what you are trying to argue against my point that DOD should be held accountable for following through with procedures after UCMJ convictions. That legislation has nothing to do with that.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google