Posted on Feb 19, 2017
Could One Year Of Mandatory National Service Change This Country?
2.47K
20
16
9
9
0
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 12
3.5 million kids are projected to graduate high school in 2016-17. All components of the Army are about one million. We would have to support all these people. Come up with something meaningful for them to do (so they don't resent it). It would be at least 24 months to get anything from them from a utility stand point. The nation would have to really accept the fact that we would take to take off the gloves compared to an all volunteer service and its policies, benefits, and culture. We would have to give carte Blanche to Company Commanders and more importantly, NCOs. Can you imagine the social media butt hurt from draftees? We would also likely have to bring back CCF and local stockades. Americans are able to endure drafted service and the privation (real or imagined) if they see the purpose in it. If they don't buy it, then it will be bad for all the professional centurions who have to keep the Army rolling along. But grass, motor pools, rocks, parking lots, PMCS, command inspection checklists would look great. No excuses, oodles of people to do all that.
Equipping all these youngsters. I think the clothing bag value is about $500. CIF will issue them $4-6000 worth of kit. Each one will need to be issued a $500 rifle. Each will receive in aggregate $1M in training just to be able to walk and chew gum at the same time. We would likely have to invent a few MOS's. Installation functions could revert to Soldiers by MOS or by BMM. I would prefer the former.
I personally don't think treading water for a year cleaning up inner city neighborhoods is going to resound with the same value as surviving the forge of initial entry training in the armed forces. Another option I think has merit is that the UN consistently suffers from the lack of standing formations for urgent humanitarian missions. This could be a source of do gooders to go deal with disaster and genocide rather than people expressing moral outrage for 15 minutes on social media.
Equipping all these youngsters. I think the clothing bag value is about $500. CIF will issue them $4-6000 worth of kit. Each one will need to be issued a $500 rifle. Each will receive in aggregate $1M in training just to be able to walk and chew gum at the same time. We would likely have to invent a few MOS's. Installation functions could revert to Soldiers by MOS or by BMM. I would prefer the former.
I personally don't think treading water for a year cleaning up inner city neighborhoods is going to resound with the same value as surviving the forge of initial entry training in the armed forces. Another option I think has merit is that the UN consistently suffers from the lack of standing formations for urgent humanitarian missions. This could be a source of do gooders to go deal with disaster and genocide rather than people expressing moral outrage for 15 minutes on social media.
(2)
(0)
CDR (Join to see)
Not to mention in a two year period you have twice as many "new" soldiers, to clothe, feed and care, house, train, and employ. Where does all the money come from.
(0)
(0)
LTC Jason Mackay
CDR (Join to see) - kind of my point. We would have to decide as a nation if it is worth it.
(0)
(0)
Yes! This idea is a big part of "Starship Troopers." Forget the movie, read the book. As presented by Heinlein, in the future you can't be a full citizen - or vote - unless you've served. Military, research, whatever.
I read this when I was 8 years old, and it has always made a great deal of sense.
I read this when I was 8 years old, and it has always made a great deal of sense.
(2)
(0)
LTC Jason Mackay
Amen brother, people need to understand the direct and indirect costs, but certainly tie it to your franchise. That gives it the so what.
(1)
(0)
I think a minimum of two years would be adequate. The cost , and time training, would need to be offset in individual commitment.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next