Posted on Nov 2, 2017
Could Trump send the New York terror suspect to Guantanamo?
2.94K
34
39
8
8
0
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 10
I imagine Trump could send the POS to GITMO. How long that would stand in court, I can't say. Probably not too long. Why he would send him to GITMO defies me ... the ISIS turd will get life without parole or the death sentence in federal court. Hands down.
(5)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
CPT (Anonymous) - No argument there. But ... my position stands. The POS got caught in the act ... he's dead meat in federal court. He'll get a fair trial ... but the outcome is not really in doubt. There is no reason to send him to GITMO ... and plenty of reasons not to.
(2)
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
CPT (Anonymous) - I think it's a dangerous precedent to set that because POTUS is "thinking out loud" that he's not "serious." That's letting him off the hook for saying ridiculous things and alleviates him of the responsibilities of integrity and self-control. If he can just say, "Well, I was just thinking out loud," if he gets caught in something, that's garbage.
(1)
(0)
What's the benefit of him going to GITMO? Aside from the ability to disregard his inherent human rights.
(5)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
CPT (Anonymous) - Direct quote from Dylan Roof during interigation
"Somebody had to do it," Roof said of the slayings. He added that "black people are killing white people everyday... What I did is so minuscule compared to what they do to white people every day."
"Somebody had to do it," Roof said of the slayings. He added that "black people are killing white people everyday... What I did is so minuscule compared to what they do to white people every day."
(0)
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
SSG (Join to see) - Are all people held at GITMO being mistreated and having their human rights violated? No, I don't think going to GITMO inherently means their rights are violated. I think being at GITMO makes it much easier for the US to do things to those people that would fall under human rights violations - ie, "enhanced interrogation," inhumane conditions, forced unnecessary medical procedures, and lack of legal representation. GITMO just makes it easier to say that these people don't deserve those human rights.
(0)
(0)
SSgt Boyd Herrst
A tribunal would do him right.. terrorism is terrorism. Label him a enemy combatant and bag him for transport!
(0)
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
SSgt Boyd Herrst - At what point do with just forgo that whole "Due Process" Amendment in the Constitution? Fear makes us do crazy things apparently.
(0)
(0)
The Attacker Is Not A US Citizen So All They Need To DO IS Declare Him An Enemy Combatant and BYE BYE
(4)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
CPT (Anonymous) - they are entitles to due process but because case law says they do NOT the constitution.
The Preamble stated who the PEOPLE are.
The Preamble stated who the PEOPLE are.
(0)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
CPT (Anonymous) - They needed a secure site to hold Terrorist near the US so they could face trail. The MP's at GITMO follow the Geneva Conventions and US Corrections System guidelines to house the prisoner. They are not being mistreated by the MP's there and its the MP's themselves that have to put up with SHit...sometimes literally as the prisoners throw it on them.
(0)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
CPT (Anonymous) - is "BASED ON" but not is the law...case law is case law. Case Law is LAW made by the Judicial Branch not the Legislative Branch and it can be change any time a court wants too. (And the Supreme Court has done that in the past.) They just have to rule in a different way or the Supreme Court can vacate a ruling or Congress and enact a law there by making any Court Decision Moot. Or as Our Last President was so fond of doing ignore the law or write an EO and do what every you want.
(0)
(0)
LCpl Mike Calhoun
SSG Stinson: After reading this back and forth between you and CPT Ghandi over here, me thinks he is a recent grad of West Point, given recent events from one of it’s grads.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next