Does Donald Trump First Class “Groping Accuser” Have a History of Conflict With Trump Property?…....

For those that don't read the article, here is an excerpt, nothing suspicious here.

“We can watch the whales go by, the pelicans go fishing, the kite surfers. It’s an idyllic life…and now Donald Trump comes along and takes that away,” said Jessica Leeds, 62, whose million-dollar property was singled out in Trump paperwork as particularly homely. (read more)

♦ The second story containing Jessica Leeds, is related to the same Rancho Palos Verdes golf course and a fence dispute between the Trump property and Jessica Leeds personally. The second story is in the LA Times dated October 30th, 2008.

First, I do not condone the alleged sexual assaults committed by Donald Trump or anybody else. I also do not discount the statements of those making the allegations, although I do think the timing makes them appear to be less credible. This is how I see this (liberally using the words and ideas from the author of an article I read.

These claims being made by several women regarding unwanted sexual advances by Donald Trump allegedly occurred anywhere from ten to thirty years ago, and, as a result, the usual biased media sources have let the hounds loose. Do we simply believe the women at face value and ignore the awfully convenient timing of this batch of accusations?

On the one hand we have the possibility that these women are innocent of any subterfuge and are seeking justice for alleged misdeeds. That would also mean that for anywhere from ten to thirty years they somehow found reason to not make much of a big deal out of the incidents. All that time Trump was a nationally known figure and a wealthy person who would be an obvious target for some sort of civil suit, if not an outright criminal prosecution. Even if they had “put it all behind them” for some reason, but were reminded of the offenses when they noticed that Trump was running for President, this could have been done as early as the fall of 2014. Or any time in 2015 when Trump was rising in the polls after officially launching his campaign. Or any time during the primary when he was closing the deal. Or even after the convention when he was the official candidate and climbing in the polls.

Instead, it happened in the final three weeks of the election. Where were these stories before now? Were these women beating down the doors of reporters but being cruelly turned away by the Trump loving folks at the New York Times who didn’t want to report on them and possibly damage Trump’s chances? (Try not to choke on the sarcasm in that one.) Were they somehow unaware that the election was going on and that Trump was running until one of them finally purchased a television last week? And these revelations all seem to miraculously happen on the precise days when Wikileaks dumps yet another bale of misery on Hillary Clinton’s head.

There is, of course, a second possible explanation. That would be the case of this being a standard oppo drop from the Clinton campaign which they’ve been sitting on for two years and plenty of folks in the liberal media knew about, but it was being held back until the moment when it could inflict the maximum damage on Trump and provide the greatest amount of cover to deflect attention from any negative press for Clinton. And even if the stories are true (and I wouldn’t rule out the one about kissing) where was the interest in “justice” for these women for the past two years? If they were so poorly treated and in need of justice, why make them wait this long?

Interesting how defaming the White House so many times with predatory sex assaults are no issue since they were personal, yet we are fighting the same actions of a similar nature through out the military. Our resident feminazi's can overlook one, yet attacking a private banter. Hypocrisy has no bounds. They and the Clinton's are thoroughly disgusting.