Avatar feed
Responses: 3
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
3
3
0
She's not a hacker. She's a former Airmen linguist turned contractor who allowed politics to betray her oath to her country. The manner in which she acquired and stole the documents she released had nothing to do with hacking. All she did was print the documents, and then emailed a scanned copy to the media.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Owner/Partner
(Join to see)
>1 y
Um...the rough definition of hacking includes "... a person who illegally gains access to and sometimes tampers with information in a computer system" Mirriam Webster Dictionary. She downloaded the documents - hence the hacking.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
>1 y
(Join to see) - I know the definition. I have briefed it and many other cyber related terms to senior leaders on countless occasions. Winner did not gain access to the documents illegally, as she had authorization to access the computers/sites. She also did not tamper with the information, she printed it out on a printer (again, not illegal). Her crime was to illegally take the information out of a secure facility, without authorization, for the purpose of illegally releasing to others who do not have need to know/the authorization to view it, with the intent of harming the President of the US. That is not a hacker. As someone who has spent a better part of my career emulating what actual hackers do, I'm pretty well versed on the subject. Parsing words to fit your definition only confuses people, potentially making them believe she's something she's not. If you still don't believe me and/or want to continue parsing words, explain why she hasn't been charged for abusing the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 USC 1030 which would be the applicable charge for hacking a government system.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Owner/Partner
(Join to see)
>1 y
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin - It would be up to the government to decide what charges would garner the most likely conviction, so as to why the aforementioned charges were not laid would have to be asked of those in authority. The "hacking" goes to her intent - whether she did or din not intend to remove information that was not hers to take. I don't parse words to confuse people; IMO, the term hacking has become a very broad brush, meant to encompass a wide spectrum of both legal and illegal activities.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
>1 y
Broad brush or not, you're not using the term correctly. This is my world and I'm giving you an expert perspective. Find an article which defines her as a hacker. Just one. Leaking information, be it from a computer or not, does not define one as a hacker.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Robert Webster
2
2
0
Not only your printer, but any device that keeps a log file. The printer technology is not new or secret, it was even used with fax (facsimile) machines and Xerox (and other brand) copiers. Even some dot matrix printers(Epson 24 pin, for some reason comes to mind) had this ability.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC John Shaw
1
1
0
Politics is poison for almost anyone, I am glad some of the simple methods of tracking work to catch people doing stupid things with data. This stupidity will be cold comfort for her for the many years she will spend behind bars.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close