Avatar feed
Responses: 4
1SG Signal Support Systems Specialist
3
3
0
Know your audience. Sometimes you have to break it down "barney style".
(3)
Comment
(0)
SSG Robert Mark Odom
SSG Robert Mark Odom
5 y
Good point!
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Cpl Jeff N.
3
3
0
So, the president would "push back" in intel briefings. Oh no, how can we have this! He is challenging the experts! Below are some of the comments/questions from the article she (Gordon) said Trump would say/ask. These are the questions and statement I would expect someone responsible for the outcomes of the things we do in the world to ask. The arrogance of people like Gordon to think her "intel" brief should be swallowed with zero pushback or questions. Then, the second excerpt undoes her concern about someone/anyone questioning the intel.

___________________________________________________________________________________

Speaking to the Women’s Foreign Policy Group, Gordon said Trump had two frequent responses during briefings, CNN reported. "The one is 'I'm not sure I believe that,'" Gordon said, according to CNN. "And the other is the second-order and third-order effects. 'Why is that true? Why are we there? Why is this what you believe? Why do we do that?' Those sorts of things."

"Remember, intelligence is fundamentally a craft of uncertainty and of possibility, so that doesn't put you off. It's trying to catch up to how you adjudicate the sources that led him to believe that and how you respond to it," she said.

________________________________________________________________________________

Intelligence is a business of uncertainly and possibility. Asking tough questions or making stark challenges is what should be happening. The group think in the intelligence community can be a dangerous thing.
(3)
Comment
(0)
LTC Multifunctional Logistician
LTC (Join to see)
5 y
Trump should bomb an aspirin factory in Sudan. That should appease the Intel Community.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Jeff N.
Cpl Jeff N.
5 y
LTC (Join to see) - You only get away with that if you are a democrat.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPT Lawrence Cable
CPT Lawrence Cable
5 y
LTC (Join to see) - I'm with you on this one. What, question the group that misread the Bay of Pigs, missed the collapse of the Soviet Union, did predict that Saddam would actually invade Kuwait and didn't see 9/11? I would make the back up everything they said.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Jeff N.
Cpl Jeff N.
5 y
CPT Lawrence Cable - That is what any smart, sensible executive would do, period. Intelligence is not an exact science. Things are misread, missed, misinterpreted etc. all of the time. The questions force discussion, discussion forces them to explain and consider their sources, interpretations, facts vs opinions etc. It is the presidents job to decide. They are government employees, not policy makers. They seem to forget that a lot up there in DC>
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Steven Imerman
3
3
0
Edited 5 y ago
Thanks for the share. Sounds like he is not one to believe something simply because an "expert" said it, he needs to understand the "whys" and "wherefores."
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close