Posted on Aug 27, 2018
Fury: WA Activists to Battle High Court’s I-1639 Reverse - Liberty Park Press
573
11
11
4
4
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 4
Not much of a surprise with a liberal Supreme Court! To bad they have to legislate instead of rule on the law. The voter law was clear!
(2)
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
MSG Johnathan Mathes - 1. What state law was violated by the court?
2.If the voters want to change a law, is that not their right?
2.If the voters want to change a law, is that not their right?
(1)
(0)
MSG Johnathan Mathes
1. Did you read the article?
2. Perception may be biased off what’s wrote... by free press of all things
3. I don’t delegate state laws .. I can only say what I read...
4. Like I said liberal courts move goals post to score a vote they wouldn’t have got otherwise.. am I saying they cannot put it on a ballot.. no... but everything is up for interpretation these days... how many times has the Supreme Court had to step and redo a biased opinion.
5. Sorry but no I don’t believe you get to vote everyone else’s rights away because of bad apples... irresponsible people... mentally ill people or people with morales
2. Perception may be biased off what’s wrote... by free press of all things
3. I don’t delegate state laws .. I can only say what I read...
4. Like I said liberal courts move goals post to score a vote they wouldn’t have got otherwise.. am I saying they cannot put it on a ballot.. no... but everything is up for interpretation these days... how many times has the Supreme Court had to step and redo a biased opinion.
5. Sorry but no I don’t believe you get to vote everyone else’s rights away because of bad apples... irresponsible people... mentally ill people or people with morales
(1)
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
CDR Dan Cunningham - No, and that is a silly question. However, I do support voting.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next