Avatar feed
Responses: 2
Lt Col Charlie Brown
5
5
0
A lot of this depends on your personality and your tolerance for uncertainty. Some people like the government side because in a lot of ways it is much like the military without a uniform.
(5)
Comment
(0)
SFC Jason Evans
SFC Jason Evans
>1 y
GS positions are more stable positions for sure. The reason I'm not looking for a GS position is it doesn't pay as well as contracting and the bureaucracy is more than I want to deal with. Contracting is way more flexible but the trade off is the uncertainty, like you said.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LCpl Ferdinand Hughes
2
2
0
I have worked on both sides of the coin. They each have there pro and cons. The money was good as a contractor but sometimes you run in the problem of if the contracting company will get the contract renewed. You don't get some of the perks as a federal employee such as getting a 59 or the benefits offered to federal employees. As a contractor, you are not guaranteed a raise unless the contract is renegotiated. One positive note as a contractor I was able to gain from was that I wouldn't be out of work due to a government shutdown. I still prefer the federal employee route since I can sell back my service time and don't need work a full 20 years of civil service if I choose to go that route. It also gives an array of other positions in the federal government or agencies to aim for, if you qualify of course.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close