Posted on May 20, 2017
Harvard Study: 80% of Trump Coverage Was Negative During First 100 Days
1.44K
15
15
3
3
0
It gets harder each day to find decent news. I never remember the media being so biased before. Why is this? It would be great if there was an actual Independent news source. But I think that is just wishful thinking. BTW I searched to see if this had been posted and didn't find it. If it is a duplicate I am sorry.
Harvard Study: 80% of Trump Coverage Was Negative During First 100 Days
Posted from insider.foxnews.comPosted in these groups: 
Media
Office of the President (POTUS)
Media Office of the President (POTUS)
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 12
3
3
0
SGM, I know it is in here somewhere, but I posted something similar about a week or so ago, there was a kid journalist who was actually getting it right, and approched the questions from an information seeking perspective that was very well done, and I was very impressed by him. There are a few domestic (very few) but they are out there, good luck with your search
(3)
(0)
2
2
0
Trump isn't giving political favors to the connected DC class and the press is furious. They are used to being catered to, and that has ended.
(2)
(0)
Cpl Joshua Caldwell
CPL (Anonymous) - Which to those of us who aren't completely ignorant about how economics works, is how you get an economy going. Corps have only two choices of what to do with cash. They can either reinvest it into things that make the company more competitive, or they can distribute it to the share holders, which is everyone of us who has a TSP acct or an IRA.
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
Flat out unrestricted warfare against our democratically elected president. If you can't find anything good he has done, as Hillary stated, "It takes a willing suspension of disbelief".
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google