Posted on Jun 10, 2019
House Contempt Vote Against The Attorney General: What You Need To Know
3.53K
41
19
10
10
0
Not saying it's OK to blow off a subpoena. But if POTUS says the material is covered under Presidential Privileged, then the Democrats in the Judicial Committee decide that they are going to send their minions out to question the Attorney General of the United States, not some schmuck off the road, what in the hell do you expect the man to do? Kiss your butts because you think that you're high and mighty? Also, I guess it was OK when Eris Holder blew off Congress when he was supposed to testify on Fast and Furious. Pot meet Kettle.
House Contempt Vote Against The Attorney General: What You Need To Know
Posted from npr.org
DOJ
Congress
Law
Law Enforcement
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 8
6
6
0
Smoke and mirrors for the election coming. Look how much we are doing- when the real issues are not getting fixed. Term limits. Vote for change and send the message.
(6)
(0)
SFC Marc W.
SGM Steve Wettstein This comment right here nails it. They knew that they were issuing a subpoena for something that the AG could not legally give them. It was a pathetic attempt to put him in a catch 22 and the AG and president's legal team saw and squashed. This is a form of pandering.
(2)
(0)
Maj Marty Hogan
MCPO Roger Collins - absolutely not. Not until we learn that we actually have the power and quit being complacent. Our history shows we gravitate to the path of least resistance or in this case the one that we know. Why would Congress bite the proverbial hand....
(0)
(0)
SPC Erich Guenther
All they have to do is fix the Supeona power here, mandate that Supeonas be issued only as a last resort, that they be bi-partisian and signed off by majority lead of each party, that the supeona is clearly written and passes a basic legal test of it being "lawful". Add those three requirements and the supeonas issued by Congress would be reported on and taken more seriously.
(2)
(0)
SGM Steve Wettstein
Maj Marty Hogan Terms limits is what we need. Term limits is what we won't get. :-( Thank you for your reply Sir.
(1)
(0)
6
6
0
I responded to this elsewhere. I said they should put their vote where the sun doesn't shine... I stand by that.
(6)
(0)
SGM Steve Wettstein
Damn. I didn't see it posted before. I hate seeing multiple posts on the same subject. Also, thank you for your reply.
(0)
(0)
3
3
0
This whole effort is a twofer, payback and conditioning the field of battle for the upcoming 2020 election.
(3)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google