I'd 'absolutely' boot a Trump donor like Peter Thiel from my board, VC says

There have been people that refuse to serve people based on their sexual orientation and people (some even on here) cheer for them, saying it's their right. So if the former should be seen as being wrong (and for the record, I think that's a garbage excuse. You don't make someone pay for supporting someone or something you don't), then so is the latter. Freedom is not a one way street and does not just apply to you or to who you support.

CPT (Join to see) This Trump tape I find ridiculous. It is from 2005. Is that how far back they have to go to smear the man? Just let him speak, he will smear himself. This is a huge problem with politics as usual. All they would need to stifle support for the man is to corner him on points of policy. The reason that they won't do that is because Hillary would crumble under the same scrutiny. That is the whole reason behind negative campaign adds. It takes the focus off of one candidates short comings by accentuating the other candidates short comings. The answer to your direct question is No, economics, Foreign Policy, regulations, healthcare, tax and spend, nor any other policy issue have any bearing on a presidential election. Republican automatically is conservative fiscally and socially. Democrat is automatically socially and fiscally liberal. So once a candidate locks down a nomination, policy is no longer an issue. It is during the primaries when candidates within the party are trying to differentiate themselves from other candidates of similar ideals that policy matters come into play. With Trump it was a simple matter of I am different because I am not a politician, which was good enough for the Republican primary voters.

A Progressive Double Standard Hypocrite... or HRC supporter...