Posted on Mar 31, 2018
ill-advised-tweet-became-nightmare-fox-news-show-184523014.html
463
11
3
3
3
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 3
And to add to his ignorant remarks from before, we can add this one: "I know she’s a talk show host, but she also has a responsibility to show both sides of a story,” he said during an interview on CNN’s New Day." Interesting that those on the left to include most of what is considered MSM and this young person, refuses to abide by it or to even follow that advice.
(3)
(0)
A few hours before this was posted this is what I stated in another discussion thread:
For someone that wants to be treated as an adult, he acts like a child throwing a tantrum if they do not get their way. And then they want to be treated as a child in some instances and an adult in others. And his childish statement in response to an adult chiding him for his achievements, well it stands for and by itself.
“An apology in an effort just to save your advertisers is not enough,” he tweeted. “I will only accept your apology only if you denounce the way your network has treated my friends and I in this fight. It’s time to love thy neighbor, not mudsling at children.”
At 17, you cannot have it both ways, either your a child and should be treated as such; or you are an adult and should be treated as such. Especially now that you are a 'public figure,' whether it is as a full fledged public figure or a 'limited purpose public figure.' And these individuals are not 'involuntary public figures.'
Unfortunately, I believe that his handlers knew exactly what they were/are doing. They expected on one hand that due to today's culture of handling a child's tantrum that they could achieve what they wanted. And this is exactly what happened. They want to use the 1st Amendment in that way, someone needs to take the 1st Amendment and the SCOTUS decision from the 1964 case of "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan" and shove it down their throats.
But no, then someone will accuse you of 'child abuse' just like they did with Laura Ingraham and Fox News Channel, and get away with a lie.
For someone that wants to be treated as an adult, he acts like a child throwing a tantrum if they do not get their way. And then they want to be treated as a child in some instances and an adult in others. And his childish statement in response to an adult chiding him for his achievements, well it stands for and by itself.
“An apology in an effort just to save your advertisers is not enough,” he tweeted. “I will only accept your apology only if you denounce the way your network has treated my friends and I in this fight. It’s time to love thy neighbor, not mudsling at children.”
At 17, you cannot have it both ways, either your a child and should be treated as such; or you are an adult and should be treated as such. Especially now that you are a 'public figure,' whether it is as a full fledged public figure or a 'limited purpose public figure.' And these individuals are not 'involuntary public figures.'
Unfortunately, I believe that his handlers knew exactly what they were/are doing. They expected on one hand that due to today's culture of handling a child's tantrum that they could achieve what they wanted. And this is exactly what happened. They want to use the 1st Amendment in that way, someone needs to take the 1st Amendment and the SCOTUS decision from the 1964 case of "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan" and shove it down their throats.
But no, then someone will accuse you of 'child abuse' just like they did with Laura Ingraham and Fox News Channel, and get away with a lie.
(3)
(0)
Read This Next