3
3
0
I just had another potential brainstorm...for all you AI types out there, I think you're all gonna get a kick outta this, get those mental gears revolving, you know?
Intelligence
Posted from ourworldindata.org
Technology
Computers
Software
Electronics
Science
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 2
2
2
0
The brain is an organ that can be affected by environment, nutrition, health, etc just like every other human organ. Why would anyone be surprised by or argue with the premise that is still evolving and improving?
(2)
(0)
Capt Daniel Goodman
I follow, read what I just sent in, the latest piece, and read what I wrote...tell me what you think, I'd be really interested to know honest, OK? Thanks....
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
Since test have a varied over time you relay can no compare IQ over time. And the median IQ at any given time will always be 100, that is what a IQ of 100 means. Now if you gave people the same tests as were give a century ago, and fouls evidence of people taking the century old test in multiple time periods in between It might make statistical sense. And since IQ is a statistical comparison not a hard number statistical significance is essential.
IQ results can not increase over time since what 100 means rises with the mean .I read it twice, and it looks like someone was trying very hard to prove an agenda.
We may, or probably be getting smarter with better nutrition and childhoods exposure to mental stimulus, but this study does little to prove it.
IQ results can not increase over time since what 100 means rises with the mean .I read it twice, and it looks like someone was trying very hard to prove an agenda.
We may, or probably be getting smarter with better nutrition and childhoods exposure to mental stimulus, but this study does little to prove it.
(1)
(0)
Capt Daniel Goodman
I fathom that, honest...I was just following a line of thought I'd had, sometimes, I kind of try to use ephe group on here to kind of crowdsourde my various thought trains, you know?
(2)
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
Capt Daniel Goodman - I Was not criticizing you for posting, just disagreeing with the premise of the link. It was food for thought
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google