Avatar feed
Responses: 7
SGT Whatever Needs Doing.
5
5
0
Doesn't bother me any. Precision ammo is too expensive to just spray away.
(5)
Comment
(0)
SGT Jim Arnold
SGT Jim Arnold
7 y
The fx9 not the glock
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Christopher Brose
SSgt Christopher Brose
7 y
SGT Jim Arnold - Didn't even know those existed. I thought bump stocks were only made for semi-auto rifles.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Jim Arnold
SGT Jim Arnold
7 y
That was the beauty of the fx9. A AR15 type frame
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Christopher Brose
SSgt Christopher Brose
7 y
A 9mm doesn't seem like it would provide enough recoil energy to make a bump stock work. Interesting.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Christopher Brose
5
5
0
The headline is a little misleading, it make it sound like an Executive Order rather than directing DOJ to determine the legality of bump stocks.
(5)
Comment
(0)
Capt Dwayne Conyers
Capt Dwayne Conyers
7 y
Baby steps?
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Christopher Brose
SSgt Christopher Brose
7 y
Capt Dwayne Conyers - Most legislation happens in baby steps. It's still a misleading headline.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Cpl Jeff N.
3
3
0
While I have no issue with bump stocks being banned should it happen, that is not really going to matter a lot. In our entire history they have been used once in a shooting (or so it appears). I think it is a good faith move but you can simulate what a bump stock does with more common items too if you are so inclined.
(3)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Don Bigger
MAJ Don Bigger
7 y
Agree. And I can simulate a bump stock with my belt loop. Don’t do it very often because there’s no point to it.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Jeff N.
Cpl Jeff N.
7 y
MAJ Don Bigger - I use enough ammo in semi auto mode. I would hate to see my ammo spend on full rock and roll mode.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close