Posted on Nov 10, 2021
Key Rittenhouse Witness Claims He Was Asked To Change His Statement By Prosecution
785
14
8
5
5
0
Is this prosecutorial misconduct? This case is coming apart faster than a house of cards in a windstorm. One prosecution witness did not have his cell phone searched because Marsy’s law was applied by the district attorney. Seems there was an effort to suppress information also.
Key Rittenhouse Witness Claims He Was Asked To Change His Statement By Prosecution
Posted from dailycaller.com
Crime
Murder
Riots
Posted 3 y ago
Responses: 4
3
3
0
This is what happens when you do things by mob rule, instead of following the facts. But, of course, when he is acquitted (not sure what all the charges are he may get some smaller one), there will be riots because the 3 year old mentality of some will not accept they weren't right.
(3)
(0)
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
I'm still amazed at the number of people on RP alone who cannot see the facts and concede, regardless of what they think about Rittenhouse, that he legally acted in self defense.
(1)
(0)
2
2
0
Rittenhouse is a murderer. The Trumptards here will say any lie to protect their little white supremist bigot who intentionally crossed state lines, broke WI. laws to get a gun, had absolutely no reason but to play vigilante to be here, murdered two people, and while trying he tried to kill a third. And FYI, the Kenosha cops are no better. 9 shots into a man's back?? I could just hear what would be said if it were the opposite. But the truth is, it's republicans who are doing the killing.
(2)
(0)
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
One, you need to tone down the rhetoric as you broadly make claims about groups of people. Two, the Rittenhouse defense team is proving you're completely ignorant to this entire case and I highly doubt you've even listened to or even care about any of the facts. You're just a dog with a bone who believes Rittenhouse fits a specific narrative/profile and nothing, even facts, will change your mind. Just curious though... Do you care anything about the fact that the third person shot, Grossklutz, had an illegal weapon while going to a riot? Do you define him to be a vigilante?
As you saw fit to bring another tangent into the mix, the Officer who fired (7 shots, not nine, just to highlight your inability to get facts straight) was investigated and allowed to return to duty. Even the DOJ decided there was nothing more to investigate and moved on. Jacob Blake, had a knife (which he admitted to) which was a threat to not only the Police Officer, but also the kid in the car. Even the Mom stood there and screamed "he's got my keys" and "my kid's in the car." But again, facts and context don't concern you. You see race and you're mad with the Police, so everything they do is wrong, despite the video evidence which proves your ignorance. Despite Blake's history with sexual assault and domestic abuse (to which there was already a warrant for his arrest). But screw that right? Forget the fact that woman who had been abused by Blake was RIGHT THERE and was forced to call the Police to help her. Forget the fact Blake resisted, had a knife, and tried to get into a car with the woman's car, kid in tow. Come on SFC, you can't possibly tell me this is ok with you.
The Police acted appropriately with Blake and Rittenhouse legally defended himself.
As you saw fit to bring another tangent into the mix, the Officer who fired (7 shots, not nine, just to highlight your inability to get facts straight) was investigated and allowed to return to duty. Even the DOJ decided there was nothing more to investigate and moved on. Jacob Blake, had a knife (which he admitted to) which was a threat to not only the Police Officer, but also the kid in the car. Even the Mom stood there and screamed "he's got my keys" and "my kid's in the car." But again, facts and context don't concern you. You see race and you're mad with the Police, so everything they do is wrong, despite the video evidence which proves your ignorance. Despite Blake's history with sexual assault and domestic abuse (to which there was already a warrant for his arrest). But screw that right? Forget the fact that woman who had been abused by Blake was RIGHT THERE and was forced to call the Police to help her. Forget the fact Blake resisted, had a knife, and tried to get into a car with the woman's car, kid in tow. Come on SFC, you can't possibly tell me this is ok with you.
The Police acted appropriately with Blake and Rittenhouse legally defended himself.
(1)
(0)
CMSgt Marcus Falleaf
Maybe I voted up because a Trumptard can't get beyond Donald. They're evidently on both sides of the isle.
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
After listening to the facts of this case, looking at the video, and understanding the conduct, timeline, and background of each of the participants, I am completely convinced Rittenhouse legally defended himself as he was attacked without provocation.
The mainstream media in this story has been completely disgraceful. They once again failed to gather the facts, and/or omitted them to fit a narrative. What narrative? Pick one... Gun control, white supremacy, anti-rioting, etc. Immediately they labeled him and stated inaccurate details of the case as fact.
The prosecution in this case has been disgraceful. Each of his own witnesses have destroyed his case, including the one individual who was shot and lived through the ordeal.
At the most, Rittenhouse will be cited for an illegal possession charge (a misdemeanor).
The mainstream media in this story has been completely disgraceful. They once again failed to gather the facts, and/or omitted them to fit a narrative. What narrative? Pick one... Gun control, white supremacy, anti-rioting, etc. Immediately they labeled him and stated inaccurate details of the case as fact.
The prosecution in this case has been disgraceful. Each of his own witnesses have destroyed his case, including the one individual who was shot and lived through the ordeal.
At the most, Rittenhouse will be cited for an illegal possession charge (a misdemeanor).
(2)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google