Posted on Aug 8, 2016
Khizr Khan Says Constitution is Subordinate to Sharia Law. Not makin’ this up...
8.4K
136
122
12
12
0
Is there more to Khizr Khan than a grieving parent?
Khizr Khan Says Constitution is Subordinate to Sharia Law. Not makin’ this up...
Posted from joeforamerica.com
Election 2016
Politics
Democrats
Islam
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 21
11
11
0
Taking a quotation from a book researching the system of law in Saudi Arabia and using it to disparage an American who lost a son in Iraq is beyond the pale. Disgusting post and you should be ashamed for posting it. You really need to do your research and learn to see racist propaganda for what it is. Otherwise you dishonor yourself and your service.
(11)
(0)
MSgt Michael Smith
PO2 Mark Saffell - The GOP certainly has no problem using dead Benghazi Consular officers and their families for political gain. They've been doing it for 5 years now.
(0)
(0)
MSgt Michael Smith
SPC Randy Semanko - Actually SPC Semanko, it is U.S. businessmen, corporations, and industries, that use those Visas that Mr. Khan administrates to get the talent they need from overseas. Mr. Khan's Visas are granted to highly skilled foreign national employees that companies hire to fill specific roles. Purely capitalist and corporate, just like the GOP loves.
(0)
(0)
PO2 Mark Saffell
MSgt Michael Smith so in your mind it is ok for HRC to call a Gold Star family liars but not ok what Trump said? If you believe in a double standard, please have the nerve to stand up and say whatever HRC does or says is ok and whatever Trump says is bad and wrong. OR if by chance you believe in equal treatment lets see you call HRC out for calling Families liars.
(0)
(0)
7
7
0
"Don't believe everything you read on the internet." Ben Franklin 1778
Come on Lieutenant Colonel Frank D. You don't actually find this to be a credible story do you?
Come on Lieutenant Colonel Frank D. You don't actually find this to be a credible story do you?
(7)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
SSG (Join to see) I dont believe all of it no, but much of it I have read on other sites. His law practice, the website is now down though I am sure google has it cached. His donations to the democratic party. There is a lot of confirmed fact in this post along with some poetic license.
(1)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
I looked it up and the only sources posting the Sharia law story are are right wing websites. Most are blogs or other bat shit crazy sources. I'm sure he has donated to the Democratic Party since he supports the nominee. The only "mainstream" source is CNN. It's a video with Katrina Pearson repeating the same charge. Khan denies it.
(0)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
Mr Khan is a Muslim and his knowledge of Sharia Law goes well beyond the average believer (witness his scholarly article - link provided). Now, it is safe to argue that Sharia Law and American Constitutional Law are incompatible. Sharia Law is founded in the doctrine of submission to ecclesiastical authority inasmuch as individuals are incapable of governing themselves. For example, the strictures providing for women to cover themselves completely and be accompanied by male family members is based on the Islamic assumption that men are incapable of governing their urges. The basic assumption of Constitutional law is exactly the opposite: That all men are self-governing and fully responsible for their acts. Otherwise, how could one be trusted with complete freedom? That being said, there is no evidence that Mr Khan ever advocated replacing the Constitution with Sharia Law although, to be honest, any devout Muslim who does not seek this goal is an apostate.
https://www.scribd.com/document/320016152/Khizr-Khan-Juristic-Classification-Islamic-Law
https://www.scribd.com/document/320016152/Khizr-Khan-Juristic-Classification-Islamic-Law
Khizr Khan Juristic Classification Islamic Law
Khizr Khan: Juristic Classification of Islamic Law
(4)
(0)
Suspended Profile
However, the point to Sharia Law is that it is from Allah. Other forms of government are from man, including our constitution. This also explains why who many Muslims don't identify with a country, but as a religion.
James Bannerman
MAJ (Anonymous) - I don't believe he did misunderstand, it said Sharia law is over any other law.....nothing to misunderstand.
(0)
(0)
James Bannerman
MAJ (Anonymous) - here is a quote from his writings...Khan continues to write. “All other juridical works which have been written during more than thirteen centuries are very rich and indispensable, but they must always be subordinated to the Shari’ah and open to reconsideration by all Muslims.”
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/01/khizr-khan-has-previously-written-extensively-on-sharia-law/#ixzz4GxmizbMg
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/01/khizr-khan-has-previously-written-extensively-on-sharia-law/#ixzz4GxmizbMg
Khizr Khan Has Written Extensively On Sharia Law
Khizr Khan, the Muslim father of a slain American soldier, is an attorney who has previously written in a law journal about Islamic law. He specifically wrote about the purity of the Quran and the Sun
(0)
(0)
James Bannerman
MAJ (Anonymous) - from an Islamic site. HomeReligion and SpiritualityIslamLaw of Islam
How and when does Sharia justify the stoning of women?
Answered by: Christopher,An Expert in the Law of IslamCategory
AddThis Sharing Buttons
"Sharia is generally interpreted to offer death by stoning (capital lapidation) as a punishment in some cases of fornication (zina). Zina is sexual intercourse outside of a valid marriage or lawful ownership. Other, related activities may be punishable in other ways, but they are not classified as Zina. In order for someone to be guilty of zina, they must either confess the crime or be accused in a very specific way. Accusation requires that four reputable men describe the fornication in literal terms as direct witnesses. The witnesses must have witnessed the act from different angles or different areas of a room. If the witnesses fail to meet the requirements for accusation, the accused fornicator is not guilty and the witnesses become guilty of a separate crime. Therefore, accusations of zina are not made lightly.
If someone becomes guilty of zina, they are liable for punishment dependent on whether they are free and whether they are or have been married. Virgins (those who have never been married) are liable for lashes. Free virgins receive 100 lashes while slaves receive 50. Non-virgins (anyone who is or has been married) are liable for stoning. There are some jurists who claim that exile is a viable punishment in some cases. Other schools argue about details such as whether or not stoning should occur in a pit, etc.Zina is considered part of the hudud crimes of Sharia. These five crimes (apostasy, theft, fornication, intoxication, and highway robbery) are breaches of God’s “limits” and they are considered to be extremely reprehensible crimes. Non-virgins guilty of zina are liable for stoning because the Quran (one of the primary sources from which Islamic Law is derived) is explicit in saying so. Jurists have interpreted the pertinent passages in different ways, but the orthodox view is that non-virgins must be stoned to death."
How and when does Sharia justify the stoning of women?
Answered by: Christopher,An Expert in the Law of IslamCategory
AddThis Sharing Buttons
"Sharia is generally interpreted to offer death by stoning (capital lapidation) as a punishment in some cases of fornication (zina). Zina is sexual intercourse outside of a valid marriage or lawful ownership. Other, related activities may be punishable in other ways, but they are not classified as Zina. In order for someone to be guilty of zina, they must either confess the crime or be accused in a very specific way. Accusation requires that four reputable men describe the fornication in literal terms as direct witnesses. The witnesses must have witnessed the act from different angles or different areas of a room. If the witnesses fail to meet the requirements for accusation, the accused fornicator is not guilty and the witnesses become guilty of a separate crime. Therefore, accusations of zina are not made lightly.
If someone becomes guilty of zina, they are liable for punishment dependent on whether they are free and whether they are or have been married. Virgins (those who have never been married) are liable for lashes. Free virgins receive 100 lashes while slaves receive 50. Non-virgins (anyone who is or has been married) are liable for stoning. There are some jurists who claim that exile is a viable punishment in some cases. Other schools argue about details such as whether or not stoning should occur in a pit, etc.Zina is considered part of the hudud crimes of Sharia. These five crimes (apostasy, theft, fornication, intoxication, and highway robbery) are breaches of God’s “limits” and they are considered to be extremely reprehensible crimes. Non-virgins guilty of zina are liable for stoning because the Quran (one of the primary sources from which Islamic Law is derived) is explicit in saying so. Jurists have interpreted the pertinent passages in different ways, but the orthodox view is that non-virgins must be stoned to death."
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google