Posted on Jun 5, 2017
'Mad Dog' Mattis Rolls Back Obama-Era Decision To Let Transgender Individuals Serve in Military ...
10.4K
117
60
6
4
2
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 18
I downvoted this for two reasons. First because the headline is a complete lie, and the poster had to know it was a lie. All he had to do was read the article he posted. If RP menmbers don't do something to show our disapproval of those posting outright lies (versus opinions we disagree with) then the quality of this site will continue to decline.
And secondly, the photo from the article with the pink uniformed soldier as representing transgendered soldiers is nothing less than a bigoted attack on transgendered service members, including the fine transgendered soldiers we have as RP members who are currently serving our country. How are they supposed to take that photo, and why should a photo like that be permitted on a "professional military networking website"?
And secondly, the photo from the article with the pink uniformed soldier as representing transgendered soldiers is nothing less than a bigoted attack on transgendered service members, including the fine transgendered soldiers we have as RP members who are currently serving our country. How are they supposed to take that photo, and why should a photo like that be permitted on a "professional military networking website"?
(20)
(0)
SGT(P) (Join to see)
Cynthia Croft - my response was not meant to be derogatory, respectfully, gay and transgender people serving in the military have been dealing with jokes, ball busting, and bs'ing for years this is nothing new. Now I am in no way shape or form saying that harassment, singling out, or violating SHARP/EEO is okay at all. Things like this have been apart of the military for years, its called having tough skin, the article was meant to humor the veteran community, if you think this article is bad you should see what is posted on dufflebag there are far worse articles on there. Granted this is just my opinion, I can respect and honor yours and everyone else's on here.
I have served with several, LBGTQ soldiers throughout my 9 years in the military, all of them are great people who I would trust with my life, I mean zero disrespect to them or their community.
I have served with several, LBGTQ soldiers throughout my 9 years in the military, all of them are great people who I would trust with my life, I mean zero disrespect to them or their community.
(0)
(0)
SGM (Join to see)
Telling someone to have "tough skin" in response to something that offensive is equally as offensive. Because "things like this have been a part of the military for years" is not a reason to allow it to continue. It is rude. It is offensive. And people should not have to have tough skin and tolerate it. If you have served with LBGTQ Soldiers, and cared at all about their equality, you wouldn't defend the photo. It is disgusting.
(1)
(0)
SGT(P) (Join to see)
SGM (Join to see) - MSG, respectfully I did state that I fully support LBGTQ service members as well as uphold the standards of SHARP/EEO, I have stood up for them and pointed out others wrong doings, our unit has had several briefings on the new transgender rulings.
"I have served with several, LBGTQ soldiers throughout my 9 years in the military, all of them are great people who I would trust with my life, I mean zero disrespect to them or their community." just to reiterate
"I have served with several, LBGTQ soldiers throughout my 9 years in the military, all of them are great people who I would trust with my life, I mean zero disrespect to them or their community." just to reiterate
(0)
(0)
SGM (Join to see)
SGT(P) (Join to see) - Roger. Respect doesn't come with laughing at, making fun of, or spreading derogatory information. Telling someone tough skin is a requirement is a cop-out and no one should have to have tough skin and tolerate people using humor to hide their true feelings. And comparing to Duffleblog; one may be worse, both are wrong. Making fun of people to get laughs, especially those someone doesn't know, isn't cool, its being a bully. In my opinion.
I do know typed words are difficult to relay true feelings and thoughts, I hope yours lean more towards being a friend to those you mentioned than the "more for humor than seriousness".
I do know typed words are difficult to relay true feelings and thoughts, I hope yours lean more towards being a friend to those you mentioned than the "more for humor than seriousness".
(1)
(0)
MSG Mark Million
I just received a briefing with over 200 other soldiers on Sunday regarding official policy for equal treatment of transgender soldier and their rights thereof. I would be very surprised if that brief had been given prior to a firm decision if there was significant opposition at the top.
(1)
(0)
1SG (Join to see)
I have received a couple of briefings myself and don't see where the "sky is falling" in the Army at least. I am currently serving with Soldiers who are transgender and so far......no problems.
(2)
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
1SG (Join to see) - I remember not that long ago hearing people saying that letting gays openly serve would destroy the military in short order. I have read much that the same was said when the Army was integrated. Peole who profession is war tend to handle this kind of trivia without much fuss once the orders are given.
The folks that say that they will quit usually do not, and the one thay do are helping increase the quality of the force by leaving,
The folks that say that they will quit usually do not, and the one thay do are helping increase the quality of the force by leaving,
(2)
(0)
So far it has not been reported by anything but one nut-job site and a deranged rant on Youtube so I doubt that it is may thing but fake news,
(8)
(0)
Read This Next