Avatar feed
Responses: 7
MSG Stan Hutchison
10
10
0
That is coming close to treason, and I never use that word lightly.
(10)
Comment
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
Capt Gregory Prickett
>1 y
In my opinion, while not treason, it is sedition (18 USC §2384) and for Flynn, a violation of the UCMJ (10 USC §894).
(5)
Reply
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
MSG Stan Hutchison
>1 y
Capt Gregory Prickett - Greg, you are correct. I made the above post while still angry over his remarks.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
Capt Gregory Prickett
>1 y
MSG Stan Hutchison - we all get irritated. I try (but don't always succeed) to wait to respond to those posts.
(2)
Reply
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Edward Wilcox
7
7
0
There is no legal basis for such an action. While it is true that the sitting president has declared martial law in the past, never has it been done to overturn an election. This is sedition, at the very least. He follows up his incorrect claims by saying that he "is not calling" for such action, but the result in Trump's bases will be the same. This man, and anyone else who agrees with him, needs to be arrested and charged with sedition.
(7)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CWO3 Us Marine
3
3
0
chatter, disinfo
(3)
Comment
(0)
MAJ James Woods
MAJ James Woods
>1 y
Yes. NewsMax and Flynn are notorious for disinformation and gaslighting.
(3)
Reply
(0)
CWO3 Us Marine
CWO3 (Join to see)
>1 y
MAJ James Woods - Part of future business model, financing, and revenue stream, thanks for reply
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close