3
3
0
https://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/new-yorker-digs-into-christopher-steele-the-man-behind-the-dossier [login to see] 603?playlist=associated
Project Charlemange
Project Charlemange
New Yorker digs into the man behind the dossier
Posted from msnbc.comPosted in these groups: 
Office of the President (POTUS)
Election 2016
Office of the President (POTUS) Election 2016
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 3
0
0
0
They throw around the word “Spy” as if that gives this guy credibility. He is a spy as much as an Army 35L or 35E. For the most part he was an Intel officer. The story would be so much more believable if, in the back of my mind, I didn’t have the nagging thought of the bias media. How can we trust anything they say. That is the really sad part. Not so much that this intel analyst was pointed in a particular direction like a dog chasing a criminal. Russia has been meddling in elections almost as long as the US has. Too bad the truth is going to be hidden under all the politics. What happens when a customer pays for a product? They get what they ask for- not the truth.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
0
0
0
The guy is a sleeze ball. He violated his agreement with the FBI by promoting The Dossier to the Press. . It appears the FBI then used the garbage pushed by Steele to the press to get a FISA warrants. Fusion GPS, that paid Steele for the Democratic portion of the Dossier had an employee married to a high level FBI guy. Gee nothing there folks move along .
(0)
(0)
SFC Chad Sowash
If there was really nothing here why are you wasting you're time commenting? Mueller will provide the final answer in this one.
(0)
(0)
Cpl Jeff N.
SFC Chad Sowash - David posted response because that is the purpose of this site.
There is almost no credible source remaining that thinks the dossier has anything valid in it and that it is anything other than a politically paid for document intended to be used to undermine Trump prior to the election. We know who paid for it (HRC Campaign/DNC, one in the same). We know it is political opposition research and now we know it was the primary/key piece of info presented to a FISA judge to gain warrants for eavesdropping on Trump people (and by default, Trump). McCabe has even testified (before Congress)that without the dossier no warrant would have been possible.
Who are the sources for the info in the Dossier? It appears at least some are Russians and may even be Russian Intel community members. Who was it again that we were worried about colluding with the Russians during the run up to the 2016 election?
This is/was a political hit job and you ought to be concerned that the Obama DOJ and the FBI used political opposition research to get a FISA warrant on their opposition candidate during an election cycle.
BTW, the target of the primary FISA warrant, Carter Page, still remains uncharged, unindicted and as far as anyone knows is not even the target of an investigation any longer.
You seem to be fine, almost giddy, about the federal government using its power and intel services to spy on (and unmask) political opponents. The only flaw in the entire plan was that HRC was supposed to win in a landslide and all of this would be buried in the political swamp of Washington DC, never to be heard about again...The best-laid schemes o' mice an' men, Gang aft agley
There is almost no credible source remaining that thinks the dossier has anything valid in it and that it is anything other than a politically paid for document intended to be used to undermine Trump prior to the election. We know who paid for it (HRC Campaign/DNC, one in the same). We know it is political opposition research and now we know it was the primary/key piece of info presented to a FISA judge to gain warrants for eavesdropping on Trump people (and by default, Trump). McCabe has even testified (before Congress)that without the dossier no warrant would have been possible.
Who are the sources for the info in the Dossier? It appears at least some are Russians and may even be Russian Intel community members. Who was it again that we were worried about colluding with the Russians during the run up to the 2016 election?
This is/was a political hit job and you ought to be concerned that the Obama DOJ and the FBI used political opposition research to get a FISA warrant on their opposition candidate during an election cycle.
BTW, the target of the primary FISA warrant, Carter Page, still remains uncharged, unindicted and as far as anyone knows is not even the target of an investigation any longer.
You seem to be fine, almost giddy, about the federal government using its power and intel services to spy on (and unmask) political opponents. The only flaw in the entire plan was that HRC was supposed to win in a landslide and all of this would be buried in the political swamp of Washington DC, never to be heard about again...The best-laid schemes o' mice an' men, Gang aft agley
(0)
(0)
LTC David Brown
Of course, but a perception is trying to be developed. It is like the claim politicians are bought by the NRA. Actually the NRA donates little to politicians but depends on its members. But the press is creating the image as the NRA has bought off pro second amendment politicians. You need to counter the BS.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google