8
8
0
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/broward/parkland/florida-school-shooting/fl-reg-parkland-student-draws-fire-for-shooting-ar15-at-gun-range-20180425-story,amp.html
And it keeps coming!
Now, they insist on intimidating a pro 2A student. I understand the desire to keep the school safe, but now apparently just going to a range and shooting is considered a credible threat.
Just curious if he was afforded or notified of his right to council, or if his parents were present.
And it keeps coming!
Now, they insist on intimidating a pro 2A student. I understand the desire to keep the school safe, but now apparently just going to a range and shooting is considered a credible threat.
Just curious if he was afforded or notified of his right to council, or if his parents were present.
Page Not Found - Sun Sentinel
Posted from sun-sentinel.com
Gun Control
Shooting (Sport)
Firearms and Guns
Handguns and Pistols
AR-15
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 7
5
5
0
I saw the story elsewhere. A number of things struck me: one, if he is under 18 he doesnt have to say anything without a parent present or legal counsel. If over 18, i wouldnt give them the time of day, in this situation, without counsel present.
If I can't record, they can't either, in my opinion. If they recorded I want a copy, one I can get verified that it had not been altered.
It is a sad state of affairs when this Sheriffs Dept. failed so miserably with the shooter and then goes after this young man who did nothing wrong.
If I can't record, they can't either, in my opinion. If they recorded I want a copy, one I can get verified that it had not been altered.
It is a sad state of affairs when this Sheriffs Dept. failed so miserably with the shooter and then goes after this young man who did nothing wrong.
(5)
(0)
5
5
0
"I posted a video of me showing my admiration for the Second Amendment and telling people to educate themselves about the Second Amendment because we can't trust our government to defend ourselves."...
(5)
(0)
5
5
0
MSgt Cayle Harris him being a junior, I presume he is under 18. If I am not mistaken, he cannot be interrogated without his parents being at least notified. This is the kinda shit that led to the Nazis seizing all the gun in Germany, and we all know how well that turned out. It is our right under the First Amendment to disagree with a person and their viewpoint. It is not anyone's right to persecute and intimidate a person for having a different opinion. If that were my child, I would be at the Sheriff's office and I would demand to know just what the Hel he was thinking doing that to my child. I would also be demanding that the school security guard and anyone else involved be suspended. When they told me to piss off, I would be hiring a lawyer. May not get far in the courts, but at least they might think before they run off being stupid again.
(5)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google