Posted on May 23, 2025
Question the truth on Instagram: "Don’t believe everything you see. The book “Know the only truth...
362
3
4
3
3
0
Edited 8 mo ago
Posted 8 mo ago
Responses: 1
The AE pros (i.e., degreed architects and engineers with no agenda other than looking for scientific proof) have shown that the straight down collapse of Bldg 1 & 2 and especially Bldg 7 defies the laws of physics. Likewise, that burning aviation fuel couldn't melt girders. Hard to dismiss the info and vids at the AE website. But then again, anything other than the official narrative is a ...
https://www.ae911truth.org/
https://www.ae911truth.org/
(0)
(0)
LTC David Brown
The girders didn’t have to melt. Increasing temperatures in structural steel weakens their carrying capacity causing them to deform, this lead too increased stress to the failing point on other members of the building.
(0)
(0)
LTC David Brown
The other thing I had forgotten is when heated, steel expands further increasing stresses on structural connections. https://vertexeng.com/insights/fire-how-it-affects-structural-steel-framing/#:~:text=High%20Temperature%20Effects%20on%20Steel&text=A%20reduction%20in%20yield%20strength,modulus%20of%20elasticity%20can%20occur.
(0)
(0)
LTC David Brown
We can look at temperatures reached inside the World Trade Center , structural damage on the area of impact, increased weight added by aircraft add in loss f structural integrity from heat and it isn’t a mystery s why the towers fell. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/world-trade-center#:~:text=The%20temperature%20must%20have%20reached,long%20into%20the%20cleanup%20stage.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next

Conspiracy Theories
