Avatar feed
Responses: 5
SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth
5
5
0
Thank you for the news share sister Phyllis
(5)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Senior Civil Engineer/Annuitant
4
4
0
I am for these actions against predatory colleges, and make no mistake about it: all colleges are “for profit” even state owned. MHO
(4)
Comment
(0)
PO3 Phyllis Maynard
PO3 Phyllis Maynard
>1 y
SFC (Join to see) I am very proud of him because he did not choose to let this injustice destroy his humanity or dreams of making another dream. We have to be very careful and this demonstrates why we should have support systems that we can turn to for advice and expertise. Thank you.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Maj John Bell
Maj John Bell
>1 y
If "colleges" are peddling "BS" sheepskins, it seems to me that there is fraud and problems with truth in advertising. That certainly justifies criminal and civil liability actions against those involved in perpetuating the fraud and false advertising.

I can't read the article past the "pay" wall. From the headline and the fragment I am allowed to read, it seems that the actions are against the taxpayer. I do not believe that taxpayers should be required foot the bill for someone else's poor choices as a consumer.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC Senior Counterintelligence Sergeant
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
SFC (Join to see) Exactly. I think the term "predatory schools" is a much better term to use to describe these types of issues and institutions. "For-profit" tends to be the go-to term that can shield traditional schools from their necessary shame and unrightfully blame modern schools for issues they weren't involved in.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC Senior Civil Engineer/Annuitant
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Jack Durish
4
4
0
There they go again. Thanks for the warning. Once upon a time, the law functioned (quite well) under the principle of caveat emptor (let the buyer beware). And if buyers were defrauded, the one who defrauded them would be forced to refund the purchase price as well as damages if any. There might even be punitive damages. Sadly, we tossed that for caveat vendor - let the seller beware - and business must proceed under the assumption of guilt. Even more insane, we have a court ruling taxo turum - let the tax payer beware. You financed a bad deal, now you pay for it.

[Note: Feel free to correct my Latin. That was just a guess]
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close