Posted on Apr 20, 2018
Students walk out of class to demand gun law reform - Reuters TV
1.44K
26
10
4
4
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 8
Let's do a real reform.. age to vote, age to buy alcohol, age to drive, age to join the military, age for sexual consent all 21 years old... oh I forget age to eat tide pods, age to snort comdoms...
(6)
(0)
These students have failed to accurately define the problem they wish to solve. They have been flim-flammed by their exploiters to immediately leap from "Stop school shootings!" to "More gun control!", as if it was the implied solution --- indeed the solitary solution --- to the problem of such mass-murder.
They ignore the many failures of the so-called "protections" against such mass-murder, such as a "school resource officer" and back-up deputies --- who failed to take meaningful action by immediately confronting and halting the killer. Instead, they remained outside "the killing zone".
But above all, these children were betrayed by "The Gun Free School Zone Act".
Frankly, the only purpose I can see in the "Gun Free School Zone Act" (GFSZA) is to assure the safety of a homicidal maniac for the period of time he spends slaughtering children and teachers.
It was apparently intended originally as a law to harass lawful gun owners and CCW holders by making them criminals if they lawfully possessed a gun within 1,000 feet of a school zone (see the school map of San Francisco), but repeated attacks and mass-murders of our children reveal the (at best) "unintended consequences" of that harassment law.
The fact that the gun-grabbers use these attacks to fuel their demagoguery is a clear indication that they now fully accept that slaughter of the innocents, caused by their "gun owner harassment law", even if it was not part of their plan from the start.
The slaughter of those children is only a tool for them to advance their agenda. They try to blame "lax gun laws", "assault weapons", "the NRA", for the blood that is on their hands. They refuse to consider the repeal of that GFSZA, because it serves their purpose so well. They implicitly accept any "unintended consequence" of the perverse and deadly GFSZA they pushed through under the guise of "school safety", and instead exploit the death and horror they have caused,while blaming innocent gun-owners for the blood on their hands.
These “forbidden areas” of otherwise lawful gun possession in San Francisco would follow much the same pattern in any city. Note that the map does not display areas within 1,000 feet of a school ZONE, but apparently only the school BUILDING.
http://sf-planning.org/areas-within-1000-feet-school
They ignore the many failures of the so-called "protections" against such mass-murder, such as a "school resource officer" and back-up deputies --- who failed to take meaningful action by immediately confronting and halting the killer. Instead, they remained outside "the killing zone".
But above all, these children were betrayed by "The Gun Free School Zone Act".
Frankly, the only purpose I can see in the "Gun Free School Zone Act" (GFSZA) is to assure the safety of a homicidal maniac for the period of time he spends slaughtering children and teachers.
It was apparently intended originally as a law to harass lawful gun owners and CCW holders by making them criminals if they lawfully possessed a gun within 1,000 feet of a school zone (see the school map of San Francisco), but repeated attacks and mass-murders of our children reveal the (at best) "unintended consequences" of that harassment law.
The fact that the gun-grabbers use these attacks to fuel their demagoguery is a clear indication that they now fully accept that slaughter of the innocents, caused by their "gun owner harassment law", even if it was not part of their plan from the start.
The slaughter of those children is only a tool for them to advance their agenda. They try to blame "lax gun laws", "assault weapons", "the NRA", for the blood that is on their hands. They refuse to consider the repeal of that GFSZA, because it serves their purpose so well. They implicitly accept any "unintended consequence" of the perverse and deadly GFSZA they pushed through under the guise of "school safety", and instead exploit the death and horror they have caused,while blaming innocent gun-owners for the blood on their hands.
These “forbidden areas” of otherwise lawful gun possession in San Francisco would follow much the same pattern in any city. Note that the map does not display areas within 1,000 feet of a school ZONE, but apparently only the school BUILDING.
http://sf-planning.org/areas-within-1000-feet-school
Areas Within 1,000 feet of a San Francisco School | Planning Department
Areas highlighted on the map in blue are within 1,000ft of a San Francisco school. Last updated December 2015.
(4)
(0)
Read This Next