Posted on Dec 3, 2016
Supreme Court Recount Results, County by County | Wisconsin Elections Commission
1.72K
4
7
2
2
0
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 2
Thought she said she was accepting the results? Waste of time, $ and resources! Sore losers!
(1)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
Jill Stein started this mess not Hillary. Her team eventually followed the train to ensure proper procedures were followed or something to that effect
(1)
(0)
Col Dona Marie Iversen
Of course the HRC team consistently adheres to the letter of the law with proper procedures...LOL
(0)
(0)
This is a recount that was held prior to the Presidential election, this is NOT the Jill Stein requested recount which has not finished yet. The last three Wisconsin recounts have demonstrated with the same election machines that the original count was very accurate and only off by a few hundreds of votes. However for the recent Presidential Election Wisconsin has already admitted to UNDERCOUNTING Trump votes by at least 400, in a mistake they found after the original count. So in the Presidential Recount in Wisconsin, President-Elect Trump is already starting with a 400 vote recount advantage.
(0)
(0)
SPC Erich Guenther
SGT (Join to see) - OK I read that the first time, I didn't know that was your intent.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next