Supreme Court rejects Texas' and Trump's bid to overturn election — CNN Politics

it was a joke from the beginning

Their laughter will be turned to mourning LT Brad McInnis

I am aware of that, I am also aware that they use that as a catch all excuse for not hearing a case they don't want to get entangled in. That was, in fact the easy way out I was referring to.

PO1 Kevin Dougherty .
1. This case never went through the lower Courts.
2. There was no evidence.
3. The case was to interfere into the election laws of other states.
4. The goal of the case was Judicial Activism to overturn an Election.
5. The case those who were parties to the case were acting to overthrow a duly elected offical.
6. Sedition. Insurrection and Treasonous aptly describe the case and its supporters.

SGT (Join to see) - “This case never went through the lower Courts“. What lower court could this case possibly have gone through?

SGT (Join to see) - Many other cases have indeed gone through the lower courts. This case having original jurisdiction under the Constitution should have been heard, and a decision rendered. Instead it was sidestepped on a technicality. It was not to interfere with the election in other states, but to force states to adhere to their own laws which had been violated by elected and/or non-elected officials lacking constitutional authority to make changes.

There was no sedition, and in fact there is nothing that has not happened before in elections. Two have been decided in the House, multiple elections have had various and sundry challenges, and Electors have been urged to vote for a candidate other than the one they were sworn to. Most recently in 2016. When a number of Democratic leaders were urging Electoral College members to switch their votes to Clinton. Was that seditious, treasonous, insurrection too?

SFC Bernard Walko There could be another Civil War. Militia / other patriot groups getting more organized