Supreme Court to Consider 2020 Election Challenge Lawsuits in February Conference

Every time anyone mentions "election fraud" there is a community of deniers who scoff that there is no evidence, therefore no fraud, and point to the "failure" of all court cases. Whenever I rebut their contention stating that the cases were dismissed on procedural grounds without consideration of the evidence, they laugh at me. Well folks, it seems that he who laughs last may laugh best. I am not saying there was election fraud or that the evidence is compelling. I have merely stated that many (maybe half the voters) will not accept the validity of the 2020 election until they have a fair hearing. Is it not fair and just for them to have that hearing?