Posted on Nov 6, 2017
Texas Legislator Introduces Bill to Require Background Checks for Gun Sales at Gun Shows - The...
1.18K
4
2
0
0
0
This is the argument against the law in Texas.
"In short, the law is too narrow to actually make a difference and has unintended side effects which would hurt lawful commerce in Texas.
"In short, the law is too narrow to actually make a difference and has unintended side effects which would hurt lawful commerce in Texas.
Texas Legislator Introduces Bill to Require Background Checks for Gun Sales at Gun Shows - The...
Posted from thetruthaboutguns.comPosted in these groups: 
2nd Amendment
2nd Amendment
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 1
1
1
0
When I had an FFL, I lost a lot of business because of the gun show loophole. So, I think not plugging the loophole is hurtful to commerce.
However, as has been discussed before, who will pay for the personal to respond to the call, and where would the seller call? When I ran background checks I had to use a code word that related to my FFL number so the NICS people knew I was a licensed dealer. I don't think they would respond to a non-dealer as of now.
However, as has been discussed before, who will pay for the personal to respond to the call, and where would the seller call? When I ran background checks I had to use a code word that related to my FFL number so the NICS people knew I was a licensed dealer. I don't think they would respond to a non-dealer as of now.
(1)
(0)
MSgt (Join to see)
Having lived in states that allowed private transfers I would only transfer to someone who had a valid carry permit. That way you have made a good faith reasonable effort to ensure the person is not prohibited.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google