Avatar feed
Responses: 6
TSgt David L.
6
6
0
I still need to try a 320 at the range.
(6)
Comment
(0)
TSgt David L.
TSgt David L.
>1 y
CW5 Jack Cardwell - To straight?
(1)
Reply
(0)
CW5 Jack Cardwell
CW5 Jack Cardwell
>1 y
Yes, just not what I was used to.
(1)
Reply
(0)
TSgt David L.
TSgt David L.
>1 y
CW5 Jack Cardwell - I've heard that. Nothing to compare it to but I can see why it would feel odd.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SSG Tom Pike
SSG Tom Pike
>1 y
CW5 Jack Cardwell - What do you normally shoot? or what grip angle are you used to? I generally shoot and carry Glocks so when I switch to a Beretta or 1911 they don't point right for me.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Maj Robert Thornton
4
4
0
I guess I may have to try one out, see if i like it better than the Berretta!
(4)
Comment
(0)
CW5 Jack Cardwell
CW5 Jack Cardwell
>1 y
Nothing wrong with Beretta except grip was to large for smaller hands.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Maj Robert Thornton
Maj Robert Thornton
>1 y
Thus, why I hated qualifying with it. I never could get comfortable with the grip.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
TSgt Larry Johnson
3
3
0
The only reason the damn Army chose the Sig 320 is that is the only Sig I think I don't own. I built a weapons of the military presentation to cover weapons from 1861 to the present. I had to borrow a 1911A1, M-1 carbine, and an M-9. Finally filled all those holes, and the Army decided they wanted another gun. Don't own a 320, yet! I have 220, 226, 229, 238, 938, etc... but no damn 320/M-17!
(3)
Comment
(0)
CW5 Jack Cardwell
CW5 Jack Cardwell
>1 y
I own a 320 thinking about a 320/M17 since it closed to the issue pistol.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close