Posted on Mar 27, 2018
The courts say the Parkland kids’ agenda is largely compatible with the Second Amendment
1.86K
43
26
1
1
0
We can have reasonable gun control and still let people have guns.
The courts say the Parkland kids’ agenda is largely compatible with the Second Amendment
Posted from washingtonpost.comPosted in these groups: 
Gun Control
2nd Amendment
Gun Control 2nd Amendment
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 7
6
6
0
No we can't. We can't have "reasonable" gun control because we will never agree on what is "reasonable." Before lawmakers try to limit our ability to own militia-style weapons which the Second Amendment specifically protects, people who want to ban them need to go through the process of repealing the Second Amendment.
(6)
(0)
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
Going to back out of this conversation after reminding you that Australia surrendered all their guns to the government going back to at least 1996.
(0)
(0)
SSgt Christopher Brose
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen - If you think owning an AR-15 is unreasonable, the onus is on you to explain why.
(2)
(0)
CDR Dan Cunningham
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen - That argument has no weight, since the US Supreme Court, in the Heller decision, concluded that the Second Amendment protects "arms that were not in existence at the time of the founding". Case closed.
(3)
(0)
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
Agree with Dan, but that's not what all the people screaming that restricting certain weapons infringes on their 2nd Amendment rights say.
(0)
(0)
4
4
0
The title is false and misleading.
One other item, what court has stated that the "Parkland kids' agenda" is compatible with the Second Amendment? This claim is bogus and false because a court case on this exact subject has not been conducted yet and cannot be conducted until someone brings suit and is specifically supported by case law. It hasn't happened yet.
One other item, what court has stated that the "Parkland kids' agenda" is compatible with the Second Amendment? This claim is bogus and false because a court case on this exact subject has not been conducted yet and cannot be conducted until someone brings suit and is specifically supported by case law. It hasn't happened yet.
(4)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
Probably the 9th Circuit that thinks everything in the Constitution is simply just a suggestion.
(3)
(0)
SSG Robert Webster
SSG (Join to see) - Still hasn't happened yet; so the title and their supporting statements are still false.
(1)
(0)
3
3
0
First off this is not organized by students - Deena Katz,the co-executive director of the Women’s March is the President of the non-profit 501(c)(4) March for Our Lives Action Fund. As well Nina Vinik - an anti-gun lawyer - is on the board and ironically she is writing articles in newspapers suggesting the same or like demands.
42 West, the bicoastal entertainment industry public relations firm to handling the PR for the campaign.
Just saying from the optics there is a political force driving this agenda -
https://chicago.suntimes.com/columnists/four-ways-right-now-to-fight-americas-weak-and-bloody-gun-laws/
42 West, the bicoastal entertainment industry public relations firm to handling the PR for the campaign.
Just saying from the optics there is a political force driving this agenda -
https://chicago.suntimes.com/columnists/four-ways-right-now-to-fight-americas-weak-and-bloody-gun-laws/
Four ways right now to fight America's weak and bloody gun laws
Maybe it’s time to ask the Supreme Court about the rights of the Parkland parents to see their kids grow up.
(3)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google