Posted on Oct 31, 2019
Transcript Of Trump Call Was Moved To Secure Server After Aide Voiced Concerns: Report
863
13
26
4
4
0
Posted 5 y ago
Responses: 8
This is old news. We all know it was moved. There is nothing wrong with putting information on a more secure server as long as it is maintained by the government and follows the guidelines in records management with regards to preserving official records.
That is in complete contrast to what then Sec Clinton did by maintaining her own personal server for official business (and then destroyed those servers after they were requested via a subpoena) . If you are concerned about an elected or government official trying to hide information, you need to start with the Clinton servers.
So let's see the difference. Someone voiced concerns... Ok, let's hear it. So essentially you were concerned that Trump's real intent was to pressure the Ukrainian President for dirt on his opponents? Can you prove this was his intent? No. Then it is your/his opinion. Never mind the fact that if Trump is correct about corruption from former and current candidates, we have a much bigger problem here. Still, Trump or someone from his staff has the transcripts moved to another more secure government system which fewer people have access to. Why is that? Could he be hiding the info? I don't think so as he immediately released it shortly after the first whistle blower bade his concerns known to the public. Could it be because the WH has been experiencing an unprecedented amount of leaking from within and they would like to control the flow of information leaving the WH? Sounds highly probable to me. Bottom line, Trump retained and preserved the information as required by law. Clinton, sought to hide and even succeeded in destroying information stored illegally on an unauthorized private server, despite a subpoena ordering her people to hand the servers over.
Forgive me if I don't feel as shocked as some claim to be about Trump's actions with official records. If even a foreign government has evidence (factual evidence) that members of our government are corrupt, I think it's prudent to explore that evidence. After all not long ago, three Democrat Senators sent a letter to the former government of the Ukraine to pressure them to do the same exact thing.
https://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/5-4-18%20Menendez%20joint%20letter%20to%20General%20Prosecutor%20of%20Ukraine%20on%20Mueller%20investigation.pdf
That is in complete contrast to what then Sec Clinton did by maintaining her own personal server for official business (and then destroyed those servers after they were requested via a subpoena) . If you are concerned about an elected or government official trying to hide information, you need to start with the Clinton servers.
So let's see the difference. Someone voiced concerns... Ok, let's hear it. So essentially you were concerned that Trump's real intent was to pressure the Ukrainian President for dirt on his opponents? Can you prove this was his intent? No. Then it is your/his opinion. Never mind the fact that if Trump is correct about corruption from former and current candidates, we have a much bigger problem here. Still, Trump or someone from his staff has the transcripts moved to another more secure government system which fewer people have access to. Why is that? Could he be hiding the info? I don't think so as he immediately released it shortly after the first whistle blower bade his concerns known to the public. Could it be because the WH has been experiencing an unprecedented amount of leaking from within and they would like to control the flow of information leaving the WH? Sounds highly probable to me. Bottom line, Trump retained and preserved the information as required by law. Clinton, sought to hide and even succeeded in destroying information stored illegally on an unauthorized private server, despite a subpoena ordering her people to hand the servers over.
Forgive me if I don't feel as shocked as some claim to be about Trump's actions with official records. If even a foreign government has evidence (factual evidence) that members of our government are corrupt, I think it's prudent to explore that evidence. After all not long ago, three Democrat Senators sent a letter to the former government of the Ukraine to pressure them to do the same exact thing.
https://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/5-4-18%20Menendez%20joint%20letter%20to%20General%20Prosecutor%20of%20Ukraine%20on%20Mueller%20investigation.pdf
(3)
(0)
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
MSgt Steve Sweeney - Exactly... your restated quote demonstrates you have no clue what you are talking about, with regards to me or who I choose to defend and for what reason. Instead you troll on with your flippant responses.
(0)
(0)
Maj Kevin "Mac" McLaughlin
Again with the trolling... Yes, you did... It was my thread which you chose to join and make your flippant remark. Unless you have something substantial to add to the conversation, go away.
(0)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
MSgt Steve Sweeney is the information lost or is it saved? This shouldn’t be hard for a chemical staff NCO to figure out.
(0)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
Cpl Jeff N. I beg to differ here. Steve knows all about being a personnel assistant and meth.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next