3
3
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 2
I'm finding it interesting to watch how one party is trying to undermine a law that they openly don't like, but yet they don't have the political will to repeal. And, this is all happening when they now also find themselves in the uncomfortable position of having the responsibility of executing it. This will be a case study that will get discussed in political science classes for years.
The merits of the law aside, from a political perspective it's awfully hard to convince the voters to blame an opposition party that is completely out of power. They can just easily say "If it's broken, you have the power to fix it. If you don't like it, you have the power to repeal it. Why can't you get anything done?"
The merits of the law aside, from a political perspective it's awfully hard to convince the voters to blame an opposition party that is completely out of power. They can just easily say "If it's broken, you have the power to fix it. If you don't like it, you have the power to repeal it. Why can't you get anything done?"
(2)
(0)
I believe the man lives by this kind of antagonism. But his purposes always seem to be to get the ball rolling, so to speak. He's a man of action. He hates sitting still. So, he promotes this public persona which he hopes rubs off on everyone else. Most of the time, I like what I see him doing.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next