Posted on Jun 13, 2016
3
3
0
By not calling for the immediate incarceration of ALL American Muslims until they can prove that they are innocent of anything that even remotely resembles criminality and by not calling for the immediate extermination of ALL non-American Muslims, Ms. Clinton has proven that she is a tool of the Vast Secret International IslamoCommie Conspiracy.
Right?
Right?
U.S. must protect national security, not demonize Muslims: Clinton
Posted from reuters.com
Terrorism
Hillary Clinton
Election 2016
Politics
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 8
6
6
0
COL Ted Mc There is a big difference in "demonizing Muslims" and recognizing Radical Islamic Terrorism, which she and Obama refuse to do, and taking reasonable actions to defeat them.
I agree with Newt Gingrich and others who stated that we should apply the same standards to those who communicate with ISIS as we do to those who engage in child porn. Simple contact with ISIS and/or visiting their web sites should result in arrest. The time of "playing nice" with these barbarians and those who support and/or sympathize with them has passed.
I agree with Newt Gingrich and others who stated that we should apply the same standards to those who communicate with ISIS as we do to those who engage in child porn. Simple contact with ISIS and/or visiting their web sites should result in arrest. The time of "playing nice" with these barbarians and those who support and/or sympathize with them has passed.
(6)
(0)
COL Jean (John) F. B.
SSgt Charles Freeman - LOL ... You'd better be careful with comments like that. You just might get quoted in a Hillary Clinton campaign ad... :-) There are idiots out there who firmly believe that.
(1)
(0)
COL Ted Mc
COL Jean (John) F. B. - I'm sorry, but somehow I can't quite wrap my mind around combining "freedom of thought" and "criminalizing thought" at the same time.
Mr. Trump goes too far because he DOES "demonize Muslims".
Ms. Clinton, on the other hand, doesn't go far enough because she refuses to acknowledge that what Daesh preaches is pure and unadulterated "hate" which has next to nothing whatsoever to do with "Islam" (except as a cover for it being pure and unadulterated hate).
PS - Given the ability to "re-direct" (or even to have false URLs showing in links) the murderers would LOVE to have anyone who visited a Daesh site arrested. The chaos would be overwhelming whenever a random Google search sent someone to a "banned" site - or when some hacker added perfectly innocuous URLs to the list of banned sites.
Mr. Trump goes too far because he DOES "demonize Muslims".
Ms. Clinton, on the other hand, doesn't go far enough because she refuses to acknowledge that what Daesh preaches is pure and unadulterated "hate" which has next to nothing whatsoever to do with "Islam" (except as a cover for it being pure and unadulterated hate).
PS - Given the ability to "re-direct" (or even to have false URLs showing in links) the murderers would LOVE to have anyone who visited a Daesh site arrested. The chaos would be overwhelming whenever a random Google search sent someone to a "banned" site - or when some hacker added perfectly innocuous URLs to the list of banned sites.
(0)
(0)
COL Jean (John) F. B.
COL Ted Mc I don't think that Trump demonizes all Muslims, just the Radical Islamic Terrorists, although he is right to demand that all Muslim immigration be stopped until they can be properly vetted. Using your apparent definition of "demonizing", Obama and Clinton demonize Christians, gun owners, pro-life supporters, the NRA, Conservatives, and a great many others.
The fact that Obama and Mrs. Bill Clinton won't even say the words "Radical Islamic Terrorism" is pure and simple BS. They and the press would be in over-drive publicly blaming Christians if the shooter had been a white male conservative Christian. Can you imagine the media hysteria? Do you think the press, Obama and Clinton would have any issue or hesitation in blaming Christians. Hypocrites...
Once you realize whose side Obama is really on, it all becomes abundantly clear. News-flash -- It certainly appears that he is not on the side of the USA
The fact that Obama and Mrs. Bill Clinton won't even say the words "Radical Islamic Terrorism" is pure and simple BS. They and the press would be in over-drive publicly blaming Christians if the shooter had been a white male conservative Christian. Can you imagine the media hysteria? Do you think the press, Obama and Clinton would have any issue or hesitation in blaming Christians. Hypocrites...
Once you realize whose side Obama is really on, it all becomes abundantly clear. News-flash -- It certainly appears that he is not on the side of the USA
(0)
(0)
5
5
0
If you think she gives a damn about what happened your fooling yourself, As stated she would beat babies with dead puppies to get into the presidency. Half of the money in the Clinton foundation came from Muslim countries. The Clintons and Obama have been after money from the beginning and will weaken America to do it. At the end of the day she gets to go home surrounded by armed guards and the rest of us get shot up in the streets . She sleeps like a baby and wakes up the next morning and "feels bad about it' but how bad can she feel when she had a direct hand in causing the problem. All for the money.
(5)
(0)
COL Ted Mc
PO1 Jason Taylor - PO; I don't know where you get YOUR "facts" from, but the MAJOR contributors to the Clinton Foundation are:
Greater than $25 million
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership (Canada) (see Frank Giustra)
Fred Eychaner and Alphawood Foundation
Frank Giustra, The Radcliffe Foundation
Nationale Postcode Loterij
The Children's Investment Fund Foundation
UNITAID
$10,000,001 to $25 million
AUSAID
Stephen L. Bing
Commonwealth of Australia
Presidential Commission on HIV/AIDS (COPRESIDA) of the Government of the Dominican Republic
Tom Golisano
Government of Norway
Pritzker Family Foundation (also known as J.B. and M.K. Pritzker Family Foundation)
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Denis J. O'Brien and Digicel
Cheryl and Haim Saban & The Saban Family Foundation
Susie Tompkins Buell Fund of the Marin Community Foundation
The Elma Foundation
The Hunter Foundation
The Rockefeller Foundation
The Swedish Postcode Lottery
The Victor Pinchuk Foundation
Theodore W. Waitt
$5,000,001 to $10 million
S. Daniel Abraham
Mohammed Hussein Al Amoudi
C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, Inc.
Elton John Aids Foundation
Government of the Netherlands
Irish Aid
John D. MacKay
Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD)
OCP Corporation
Michael Schumacher
State of Kuwait
The Clinton Family Foundation
The Coca-Cola Company
The Wasserman Foundation
Tracfone Wireless, Inc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Foundation#Contributors
In that list I see two (count 'em TWO) contributors who are identifiable as "Muslim".
It looks, to me, like your "Reality Check" just bounced.
Greater than $25 million
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership (Canada) (see Frank Giustra)
Fred Eychaner and Alphawood Foundation
Frank Giustra, The Radcliffe Foundation
Nationale Postcode Loterij
The Children's Investment Fund Foundation
UNITAID
$10,000,001 to $25 million
AUSAID
Stephen L. Bing
Commonwealth of Australia
Presidential Commission on HIV/AIDS (COPRESIDA) of the Government of the Dominican Republic
Tom Golisano
Government of Norway
Pritzker Family Foundation (also known as J.B. and M.K. Pritzker Family Foundation)
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Denis J. O'Brien and Digicel
Cheryl and Haim Saban & The Saban Family Foundation
Susie Tompkins Buell Fund of the Marin Community Foundation
The Elma Foundation
The Hunter Foundation
The Rockefeller Foundation
The Swedish Postcode Lottery
The Victor Pinchuk Foundation
Theodore W. Waitt
$5,000,001 to $10 million
S. Daniel Abraham
Mohammed Hussein Al Amoudi
C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, Inc.
Elton John Aids Foundation
Government of the Netherlands
Irish Aid
John D. MacKay
Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD)
OCP Corporation
Michael Schumacher
State of Kuwait
The Clinton Family Foundation
The Coca-Cola Company
The Wasserman Foundation
Tracfone Wireless, Inc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Foundation#Contributors
In that list I see two (count 'em TWO) contributors who are identifiable as "Muslim".
It looks, to me, like your "Reality Check" just bounced.
Clinton Foundation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
CabinetEconomicGun ControlEnvironmentalForeign(Clinton Doctrine)Judicial AppointmentsOne America InitiativePardons
(0)
(0)
PO1 Jason Taylor
And you actually believe what a Clinton site posts? Good god no wonder she made it as far as she did! Blind sheep tend to follow.
(0)
(0)
4
4
0
Ah, the classic "Strawman Argument". "They say..." "Trump says..." But neither they nor Trump are saying anything of the kind. Simply attribute bad ideas to them (don't worry, no one will catch on, they're not really listening) and then argue against the "bad ideas". No, it doesn't make Ms Clinton look like "a tool of the Vast Secret Internation IslamoCommie Conspiracy." It simply makes We the People look like tools of the vast not-so-secret conspiracy to elect Hillary".
(4)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google