Posted on Apr 17, 2024
U.S. Supreme Court Drops Monumental 6-3 Ruling - Red State Now Free To Enforce New Law That...
1.94K
81
15
24
24
0
The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, ruled that the state of Idaho could go ahead and enforce its ban on gender-altering medical procedures for minors that would cause permanent damage, at least for now.
U.S. Supreme Court Drops Monumental 6-3 Ruling - Red State Now Free To Enforce New Law That...
Posted from conservativebrief.com
Supreme Court
Medical
Gender
Edited 8 mo ago
Posted 8 mo ago
Responses: 10
12
12
0
Not surprised since at least 1 liberal Justice can’t define what a woman is …
(12)
(0)
10
10
0
4
4
0
The three liberal justices - Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan - dissented from the majority decision and advocated for the full injunction against the law to remain in place. The decision was to enforce its law restricting gender-affirming healthcare for transgender minors. Do they believe it's OK to mutilate a child prior to their ability to understand the situation in its entirety?
There are few federal laws prohibiting specific actions by minors however, there are various state-level laws that can restrict or penalize certain behaviors by or involving minors, particularly related to alcohol, firearms, online privacy, and gender-affirming healthcare. The legal landscape varies significantly by jurisdiction. The Federal Law does not allow anyone other than 18-year-olds to join the military unless they are 17 and have their parent's consent. So why is it fine in the eyes of the three liberals that the mutilation of young children continues? IMHO it was a social response and not a response that would protect a child - Sad!
LTC Marc King LTC David Brown MSgt Dale Johnson CMSgt (Join to see) SPC Michael Duricko, Ph.D SSG Franklin Briant MSG Greg Kelly MSG (Join to see)
There are few federal laws prohibiting specific actions by minors however, there are various state-level laws that can restrict or penalize certain behaviors by or involving minors, particularly related to alcohol, firearms, online privacy, and gender-affirming healthcare. The legal landscape varies significantly by jurisdiction. The Federal Law does not allow anyone other than 18-year-olds to join the military unless they are 17 and have their parent's consent. So why is it fine in the eyes of the three liberals that the mutilation of young children continues? IMHO it was a social response and not a response that would protect a child - Sad!
LTC Marc King LTC David Brown MSgt Dale Johnson CMSgt (Join to see) SPC Michael Duricko, Ph.D SSG Franklin Briant MSG Greg Kelly MSG (Join to see)
(4)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google