Avatar feed
Responses: 4
MCPO Roger Collins
3
3
0
Optimism in action. When I see the Labor Participation Rate gets to a more normalized level, I will be a believer. We have millions of workers on the sidelines. This creates a drain on government revenues. As stated earlier.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Aircraft Mechanic
2
2
0
The labor market is near full employment but these things never look at the number of people who ran out of unemployment benefits and still aren't working.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Col Joseph Lenertz
Col Joseph Lenertz
>1 y
Agree. I would rather see a "Full Employment" metric.
(1)
Reply
(0)
MCPO Roger Collins
MCPO Roger Collins
>1 y
From WIKIPEDIA. The LPR isn't considered, even though some statistics show over 90 million under/unemployed and not counted.

The 20th century British economist William Beveridge stated that an unemployment rate of 3% was full employment. For the United States, economist William T. Dickens found that full-employment unemployment rate varied a lot over time but equaled about 5.5 percent of the civilian labor force during the 2000s. Recently, economists have emphasized the idea that full employment represents a "range" of possible unemployment rates. For example, in 1999, in the United States, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) gives an estimate of the "full-employment unemployment rate" of 4 to 6.4%. This is the estimated unemployment rate at full employment, plus & minus the standard error of the estimate.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt John Steinmeier
1
1
0
Former President Obama's economic policies coming to fruition.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Sgt John Steinmeier
Sgt John Steinmeier
>1 y
I don't really believe my post. It was just a landmine...wanted to see who would step on it.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close