Ukrainian to US prosecutors: Why don't you want our evidence on Democrats?

Nothing will come of it. Nothing ever does. Since 1968, both parties have turned the election into a superbowl style sporting event where one supports one's team. Yay democrats, ra ra republicans! They leave us with new words to use on our opponents (snowflake, deplorable), and its a given that the winner will be demonized, accused of ____, guilty of __________ and doesn't have _______.

But give them their due...they know their audience...

“If Ukrainian prosecutors can augment their allegations with real evidence, there could be a true case of collusion worth investigating”

If there is evidence of wrongdoing, regardless of political party, it should be brought out.

There are probably a lot of reasons. First, isn’t it just a little weird/too convenient that Democrats are now alleged to have engaged in the same nonsense (Russian collusion) that we’re just now finally sorting out with the Republicans?

Second, straight from the article. “Ukraine is infamous for corruption and disinformation operations; its police agencies fight over what is considered evidence of wrongdoing. Kulyk and his bosses even have political fights over who should and shouldn’t be prosecuted. Consequently, allegations emanating from Kiev usually are taken with a grain a salt.”

If that isn’t a ringing endorsement of Eastern European justice, I’m not sure what is.