3
3
0
Russia
Humor
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 2
1
1
0
Once KGB, always KGB. Serious vetting issues to ensure he's not a double. Without assurance it's like the fox guarding the hen house IMO. Even if it doesn't involve internal security it still raises concerns about any attacks from outside. In order to provide the overall security he would have to at least be familiar with internal procedures. How familiar - is the question. At face value: should we give the keys to 4 facilities to a former KGB General? It almost sounds ludicrous in those terms.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
SGT (Join to see)
We as a country. Not individuals. I can't figure out when we began to think of Russia as some benign entity. Using a former KGB general's security firm is like letting the fox establish the security of the proverbial hen house.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google