Posted on Dec 21, 2017
VERBATIM: Firing Mueller could spark 'constitutional crisis' - Reuters TV
2.87K
94
91
5
5
0
VERBATIM: Firing Mueller could spark ‘constitutional crisis’: via @ReutersTV
VERBATIM: Firing Mueller could spark 'constitutional crisis' - Reuters TV
Posted from reut.tv
DOJ
FBI
Constitution
Donald Trump
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 21
6
6
0
Keep seeing Grumpy Cat when I try to respond to Nagle; he can’t stand being called out on his delusional views. It’s too bad because I can’t upvote him either on those rare occasions we agree on something. Well, that’s his loss. Same goes for the grumpy lawyer who doesn't like his Progressive views challenged. Progressives are more interested in telling us what they think than they are in hearing what others have to say -- especially those who dare expose their fallacies and toxic agenda.
With that said, if Trump were to fire Mueller, it would be a sure sign that Trump is serious about making good on his campaign pledge to take this country back and put control of it back in the hands of voters. Of course, the Deep State and Progressive Special Interests don't want to see that happen. Mueller is exceedingly corrupt and shouldn’t even be in the job. His whole purpose for being brought on is to conduct an open-ended witch hunt and try to find Trump guilty of something so they can not only get him out of Office but put him in jail... before he uncovers their corruption and they all go to jail. Frankly, they are very paranoid and unsophisticated. They telegraph all their moves and Trump reads them like an X-ray; he sees right through them. Trump is giving them the rope and they will use it to hang themselves! Watch and see!
With that said, if Trump were to fire Mueller, it would be a sure sign that Trump is serious about making good on his campaign pledge to take this country back and put control of it back in the hands of voters. Of course, the Deep State and Progressive Special Interests don't want to see that happen. Mueller is exceedingly corrupt and shouldn’t even be in the job. His whole purpose for being brought on is to conduct an open-ended witch hunt and try to find Trump guilty of something so they can not only get him out of Office but put him in jail... before he uncovers their corruption and they all go to jail. Frankly, they are very paranoid and unsophisticated. They telegraph all their moves and Trump reads them like an X-ray; he sees right through them. Trump is giving them the rope and they will use it to hang themselves! Watch and see!
(6)
(0)
5
5
0
We might be able to get some answers if someone would arrange a meeting between Bill Clinton and Jeff Sessons on a remote airport...
(5)
(0)
5
5
0
I am about feed up wth this. Trump taking a dump on Pelosi’s desk could cause a constitutional crises. Eric Holder warns Trump not to dodo on Pelosi’s desk. New York Times editorial says Dumping on Pelosi’s desk is grounds for impeachment. That makes about as much sense. Mueller is an asset. The FBI fumbling along and can’t even report on wether it used the Steel Dossier is trying to uncover Trump Russian contacts. You have FBI agents shagging other FBI agents and telling them they have insurance if Trump gets elected. FISA judges have recused themselves and the press has an orgasm ever time Mueller or McCabe passes gas. I mean Trumps financial records from Deutsche Bank were subpoenaed right, well no but it sounds good anyway... why would anybody fire such an entertaining group that make the 3 stooges look like Mensa canidates! The whole process has demonstrated the press is a bunch of incompetent boased boobs to the point that even a blindman can see it! I mean really, fire Mueller while he is self destructing is insane.
(5)
(0)
MSG (Join to see)
Capt Gregory Prickett - It continues to not matter. Trump was already elected in Nov 2016. This occurred in Dec 2016. It didn't matter if Obama was still in office, there is no law against Trump or his campaign to contact other countries.
BLUF, any plan, action, etc put into place by Obama in December 2016 was subject to be overruled by Trump in Jan 2017 after he was sworn in.
http://money.cnn.com/2017/12/01/media/abc-news-flynn-correction/index.html
BLUF, any plan, action, etc put into place by Obama in December 2016 was subject to be overruled by Trump in Jan 2017 after he was sworn in.
http://money.cnn.com/2017/12/01/media/abc-news-flynn-correction/index.html
ABC News corrects bombshell Flynn report
ABC News on Friday evening issued what it called a "clarification" to a morning on-air special report that said Donald Trump, as a candidate for president, had asked Michael Flynn to make contact with the Russians.
(0)
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
MSG (Join to see) - There are all sorts of charges that can be possible against Kushner, starting with lying to a federal agent, or falsifying a government document. Those, BTW, are minimal charges. There are plenty of other, more serious charges that are still in play.
You asked what Kushner was implicated in, I provided several links. Your assertions to the contrary, it is clear that he's in Mueller's crosshairs.
You asked what Kushner was implicated in, I provided several links. Your assertions to the contrary, it is clear that he's in Mueller's crosshairs.
(0)
(0)
MSG (Join to see)
Capt Gregory Prickett
I have read plenty of things, but none appear damaging. He might be in Mueller's crosshairs, but that is primarily because he was in a central position in the campaign. To date, there has been no serious accusations of Kushner doing anything wrong. He was accused of being in a 20 minute meeting with a Russian attorney. So what? It wasn't illegal.
He was accused of being a contact for Flynn after Trump was elected. Again, so what. He was a representative for the President elect attempting to contact a foreign country. It really is immaterial if they were going to talk about sanctions or anything else. Even if Obama signed an E.O. placing sanctions on Russia, Trump as the new President had the authority to nullify the sanction. Obama's authority was no greater than trump's is.
I provided a link to a news article that was posted after your link where the networks basically said they were mistaken about when Flynn was told to contact the Russians and that it was not against the law.
There are no indications to date that Kushner knowingly lied to the FBI about anything or falsified any documents. You can be certain his attorney was sitting next to him for any interviews and would have made certain that whatever he said was factual as far as he knew.
This is in contrary to individuals such as John Podesta who knowingly lied about information such as the Dossier while the attorney sitting next to him was the one who arranged for it.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/22822/lawyer-linked-trump-dossier-sat-right-next-podesta-james-barrett
http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/11/john-podesta-met-with-fusion-gps-founder-after-trump-dossier-was-published/
I have read plenty of things, but none appear damaging. He might be in Mueller's crosshairs, but that is primarily because he was in a central position in the campaign. To date, there has been no serious accusations of Kushner doing anything wrong. He was accused of being in a 20 minute meeting with a Russian attorney. So what? It wasn't illegal.
He was accused of being a contact for Flynn after Trump was elected. Again, so what. He was a representative for the President elect attempting to contact a foreign country. It really is immaterial if they were going to talk about sanctions or anything else. Even if Obama signed an E.O. placing sanctions on Russia, Trump as the new President had the authority to nullify the sanction. Obama's authority was no greater than trump's is.
I provided a link to a news article that was posted after your link where the networks basically said they were mistaken about when Flynn was told to contact the Russians and that it was not against the law.
There are no indications to date that Kushner knowingly lied to the FBI about anything or falsified any documents. You can be certain his attorney was sitting next to him for any interviews and would have made certain that whatever he said was factual as far as he knew.
This is in contrary to individuals such as John Podesta who knowingly lied about information such as the Dossier while the attorney sitting next to him was the one who arranged for it.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/22822/lawyer-linked-trump-dossier-sat-right-next-podesta-james-barrett
http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/11/john-podesta-met-with-fusion-gps-founder-after-trump-dossier-was-published/
OOPS: Lawyer Linked To Trump Dossier Was Sitting Right Next To Podesta While He Denied Knowledge...
According to CNN, the former chair of Hillary Clinton's campaign, John Podesta, and the former chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, both
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google