Why conclusions sometimes don’t match data in scientific papers | Principia Scientific Intl.

Money alway$ talk$, I mean get$ publi$hed, I mean —> Nevermind.

I’m sorry but this is a prime example of a load of crap that manages to get published. The premise that the peer reviewed process in legitimate journals is the same as the online non-peer reviewed crap that proliferated the kast 2 years? The author diesnt even have the balls to put their name.
The information delivery was tainted when people decided to bypass the process that existed for the past century policed by experts in the field. Now everyone Cósima to be an expert because they can get online.