Avatar feed
Responses: 7
LTC Stephen F.
2
2
0
That information seems very strange SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL.
How on earth would the VA not know that direct deposits were being sent to the Federal Bureau of Prisons or state prisons?
If the checks or direct deposits were sent to the next of kin or familily beneficiaries who not imprisoned then those would seem to be legitimate expenditures.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Psychological Operations Officer
2
2
0
Edited >1 y ago
The whole idea of expecting the incarcerated vet to notify the VA is stupid. Frankly, I had no idea about this provision, and if for some reason I ended up in jail for 3 months, I would have had absolutely no idea that I was supposed to tell the VA or that I get paid for the first two months and not the last one. And I could just imagine the lag time that would be involved in that, so that by the time they turned it off, I would be entitled to get it again, and probably wouldn't be getting it.

And as the article said, given the backlog on processing current claims for vets not in jail, I'd rather they focus on those instead of making the noncriminals wait longer while they process the jailed vets paperwork. IMO they should just develop some sort of automated system where social security numbers or whatever number they use now for prisoners is matched to the VA database to look for people getting payments. But the notion that some vet in jail for years for a serious crime is going to self report himself to the VA is dumb.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Owner/Partner
(Join to see)
>1 y
I think it's called integrity, and I would hope that an incarcerated vet had at least a shred of it left, enough to at least self-report.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1stSgt Eugene Harless
2
2
0
A "simple" fix would be to make anyone being incarcerated fill out a financial statement form on any income they are receiving. If they are receiving a govt pension, (or any other income for that matter) the cost of their incarceration and medical treatment) should be deducted from it.
Anything left over is theirs. I'm pretty sure nothing is going to be left.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Owner/Partner
(Join to see)
>1 y
(Non-federal) inmates are wards of the state and most of the time, they earn between $0.10 and $0.75 an hour, if they have been assigned a job. No inmate is allowed to handle real money (for obvious reasons) so each state's DOC maintains "accounts" in the name of the inmate, where their earnings, plus any amounts sent to them by family/friends, or others, are kept. Most inmates keep their own records for the simple reason that deposits can go missing or commissary charges can be duplicated in error. Most states take a percentage from each deposit, ostensibly for account upkeep, but usually the funds are diverted to other uses. (Medical treatment is negligible at best and not provided by actual licensed doctors or nurses.) So, unless each state also returns its "cut," VA over-payments can never be fully recovered.
(1)
Reply
(0)
1stSgt Eugene Harless
1stSgt Eugene Harless
>1 y
In my opinion state or federal prison system should be allowed to garnish VA pensions. When A VA pension is withheld it goes back into the hands of the Federal Government. The burden of housing, feeding and care of prisoners is now on the state.
The prisoners should pay for their own upkeep if they have any income. regardless of the source.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close