Avatar feed
Responses: 8
SPC George Rudenko
8
8
0
We can show statistics till blue in the face that illegal weapons are used in 99.9% of crime. But with all political based rhetoric, guns, climate change, immigration, those with staunch political opinion will never listen to fact from a n expert, FBI uniform crime report, scientist, etc. We create our own micro-universe to hide from reality.
(8)
Comment
(0)
MSgt Steve Sweeney
MSgt Steve Sweeney
>1 y
87.6% of statistics found on the internet are completely made up.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Robert Webster
SSG Robert Webster
>1 y
MSgt Sweeney just killed a few more brain cells out there.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34CHqptjj9E
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC George Sease
4
4
0
If the government takes up EVERY firearm from law obedient people then CRIMINALS WILL HAVE ANY AND ALL firearms outside of the military and LEOs. There will be a butt load of criminals. The criminals are not going to turn in their weapons in anyway shape or form. When our Constitution was written the musket was the only ASSAULT WEAPON that was known and it was responsible for helping to win our freedoms. If we did not have any firearms during the War of Independence we would still be subjects/slaves. We now have weapons that the government claims are ASSULT WEAPONS. Does the government not want you and I to have any weapons at all so that they can call us subjects/slaves? The Second Admendment was included in the Constitution so that we would be called CITIZENS. How about the government take responsibility in the courts and actually punish the criminals that use weapons and NOT play LETs MAKE A DEAL and give the POS any excuses.
(4)
Comment
(0)
SSG Security Specialist
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Phillip Sivell
4
4
0
A ban on any weapons type is a violation of the 2nd Ammendment. Our right of self protection does not only guarantee our rights against individuals that try to harm us but insurers us the right to protect our selves against a government that has gained to much control. The old arguments of it was talking about muskets and such is flawed also. We are meant to self protect against the modern arms of the day. So there for “military type” weapons are exactly what we should have the freedom to own.
(4)
Comment
(0)
SSG Security Specialist
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
8a611977
if they want to use the argument about muskets I just point them to the pen and paper and tell them no Email, no twitter, ect... since our founding fathers could not have foreseen communications such as these
(3)
Reply
(0)
SSG Security Specialist
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
8bb3a162
I also carry at least 2 knives, a tactical Pen ect.... and in the house I have everything from Claymore to Katana to Bat'Leth that are all in easy reach
(4)
Reply
(0)
SSG Robert Webster
SSG Robert Webster
>1 y
SSG (Join to see) - You may want to insure that your Claymore is not cheap knock-off.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SSG Security Specialist
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
SSG Robert Webster - its sturdy enough to go in the front and stick out the back a couple of feet :)

But I prefer the Katana or the Ninjato if it is tight hallway
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close