Posted on Jul 21, 2015
SGM Matthew Quick
4.46K
6
9
3
3
0
3bafdbff
What are YOUR thoughts about leaders 'taking responsibility' for the illegal, unethical, or immoral actions of their subordinates? When is leadership ensuring personal responsibility/accountability?

//Original Article//
“You, as the head coach, take responsibility and you continue to educate,” Fisher said in taking the blame.

He also said the Seminoles’ current national perception is not the blame of the media.

“You’re judged by what you do,” he said.

Fisher spoke publicly for the first time since two of his players, De’Andre Johnson of Jacksonville and Dalvin Cook of Miami, were arrested on charges of hitting women at bars near the FSU campus in June. They are the last two winners of Florida’s “Mr. Football,” the award presented each year to the top high school player in the state.

Johnson, a quarterback, was dismissed from school when the state attorney’s office released video of the incident in which Johnson is seen punching the women after the two had a dispute over what police said was Johnson pushing the women from behind at a crowded bar.
Avatar feed
Responses: 8
SFC Michael Jackson, MBA
1
1
0
Edited 9 y ago
Jimbo Fisher and the rest the NCAA coaches have to take responsibility for the players actions. The NCAA holds them accountable, in some cases, more accountable than the players that commit the offenses. Personally, I'd like to see the individuals held to a higher standard. For example, when Oregon suspended Lagarret Blount for throwing a punch, which at the time ended his college career since he was a senior. Another example is Texas, which suspended eight players at the start of last season, and kicked some off the team completely. Too much coddling of athletes take place today.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
COL Mikel J. Burroughs
1
1
0
SGM Matthew Quick I think it is up to the level authority you have in an individual's personal life that will dictate the level of responsibility that you have. In the Reserves and National Guard we only train, lead, and have direct contact with the soldiers one weekend out of the month, sometimes more, and then two week s out of each year when they are considered Active Duty for training. I have pulled a lot of weight beyond my AO when it has come to soldiers. Let me give you an example: If heard that a soldier made a comment about committing suicide then I would reach out personally and as the Commander any day of the week go to that individual’s home with a team and get that individual to the necessary institutions for the help that is needed, but on the other hand if that individual starting beating his wife at home in between weekends (and me as the commander is unaware do to distance and his personal family life) then the police and local authorities would have to be involved, versus active duty members living on post and the military police being contacted as well as his Commander. Now if that following month I was made aware that this individual was abusing his family members than I would get with my JAG to see what legal rights I would have as a Commander to make sure this individual didn’t have access to weapons during future training events and find out what action could be taken to either remove him from the unit or military or get the necessary help to resolve the anger management issues at the individual’s own expense (if not combat related). There are a lot of “ifs” and a fine line in the two different worlds. To answer your question I've always done as much as I can to support soldiers under my command within the parameters of my authority and boundaries. Coach Fisher states that he takes responsibility for his player actions, but his span of control can only go so far and in the end he is not getting kicked off the team for a players stupidity (the player is); he will not go to jail for assault and battery (the player will). Saying and doing in this instance are vastly different than what can actually be done. The same holds true for military personnel when it comes to what we can and cannot do within the military! if anyone from the Reserve or National Guard; or legal profession would like to add to what I've said or disagree to agree or visa versa I'm all ears? By the way I ran out of "thumbs up" just now, so I'll catch on you on the flip side tomorrow.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CW4 Brigade Maintenance Technician
1
1
0
I've always agreed with this type of mentality to a certain extent. I have pissed of many leaders at all levels when I've stated that no matter how much of an engaged leader you are and no matter how much attention, guidance, training, mentorship and leadership that you provide your Soldiers on a daily basis, some one will make a bad decision and there shouldn't be anyone to blame but the indivual. For example, as Platoon Leader of about 27 troops, one of my rock stars got a DUI on a earlier Saturday morning. BC's policy is for the entire unit to come in the day of the DUI and conduct DUI refresher training provided by the Leadership of the offender. Training complete, my Platoon SGT and myself give the platoon a big speech about accountability, battle buddies, having a plan and responsiblities. Guess what, that next morning, I get a phone call from my CDR, another one of my guys got a DUI. My BDE and Battalion CDR blamed me and I disagreed and let them know about it. Needless to say, that conversation didn't go very well at first. Sorry for the long post, but I have mixed feelings about accountability of your Soldiers actions.
(1)
Comment
(0)
PVT Infantryman
PVT (Join to see)
9 y
You take can take a horse to the river but cant make him drink the water.
You can do all you can but at the end of the day, you can't control another human being.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close